SSLV.L vs. SRUUF
SSLV.L (Invesco Physical Silver ETC) and SRUUF (Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund) are both funds - SSLV.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while SRUUF is a Commodities fund actively managed by Sprott. SSLV.L is passively managed, while SRUUF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SSLV.L returned 45.99%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for SRUUF. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSLV.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for SRUUF.
Performance
SSLV.L vs. SRUUF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLV.L achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than SRUUF's -2.76% return.
SSLV.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 26.07%
- 1Y
- 106.19%
- 3Y*
- 45.99%
- 5Y*
- 21.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.85%
SRUUF
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- -7.66%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- 16.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSLV.L vs. SRUUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 2.90% | 147.68% | 21.10% | -0.93% | 3.59% | -8.91% |
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | -2.76% | 12.66% | -18.89% | 82.09% | 7.65% | 17.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLV.L and SRUUF is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SSLV.L and SRUUF shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSLV.L vs. SRUUF — Risk / Return Rank
SSLV.L
SRUUF
SSLV.L vs. SRUUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) and Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLV.L | SRUUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.11 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 0.71 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.08 | 1.43 | +4.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLV.L | SRUUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 0.47 | +1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.38 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
SSLV.L vs. SRUUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLV.L drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than SRUUF's maximum drawdown of -48.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLV.L and SRUUF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLV.L | SRUUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.62% | -48.68% | -25.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.61% | -22.98% | -17.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.61% | -48.68% | +8.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.24% | -24.46% | -10.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.25% | -21.79% | -30.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.65% | 11.43% | +7.22% |
Volatility
SSLV.L vs. SRUUF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) has a higher volatility of 17.44% compared to Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) at 8.23%. This indicates that SSLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRUUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSLV.L | SRUUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.44% | 8.23% | +9.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.09% | 24.71% | +29.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.84% | 34.59% | +22.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.50% | 41.80% | -6.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.89% | 41.80% | -10.91% |
SSLV.L vs. SRUUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLV.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SRUUF's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSLV.L vs. SRUUF - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLV.L nor SRUUF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSLV.L and SRUUF have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SSLV.L and SRUUF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer