SSLV.L vs. SILG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L).
SSLV.L and SILG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSLV.L is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Apr 13, 2011. SILG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD. It was launched on May 6, 2022.
Performance
SSLV.L vs. SILG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSLV.L vs. SILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 5.48% | 147.68% | 21.10% | -0.93% | 6.06% |
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 12.97% | 173.15% | 11.64% | -1.40% | -9.85% |
Different Trading Currencies
SSLV.L is traded in USD, while SILG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SILG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSLV.L achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than SILG.L's 12.97% return.
SSLV.L
- 1D
- 2.69%
- 1M
- -13.68%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 59.57%
- 1Y
- 123.12%
- 3Y*
- 46.20%
- 5Y*
- 24.75%
- 10Y*
- 17.34%
SILG.L
- 1D
- 8.49%
- 1M
- -17.77%
- YTD
- 12.97%
- 6M
- 33.70%
- 1Y
- 151.77%
- 3Y*
- 47.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSLV.L vs. SILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSLV.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SILG.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSLV.L vs. SILG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSLV.L
SILG.L
SSLV.L vs. SILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) and Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSLV.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 3.03 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 3.16 | -0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.41 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 4.78 | -1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.33 | 15.17 | -5.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSLV.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 3.03 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.79 | -0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSLV.L and SILG.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSLV.L vs. SILG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSLV.L nor SILG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SSLV.L vs. SILG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSLV.L drawdown since its inception was -74.62%, which is greater than SILG.L's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLV.L and SILG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSLV.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.62% | -32.00% | -42.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.61% | -30.90% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.62% | -18.40% | -15.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.49% | -12.15% | -40.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.09% | 9.46% | +3.63% |
Volatility
SSLV.L vs. SILG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) is 18.21%, while Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a volatility of 20.16%. This indicates that SSLV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSLV.L | SILG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.21% | 20.16% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.88% | 42.14% | +9.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.89% | 49.82% | +4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.30% | 42.01% | -7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.24% | 42.01% | -11.77% |