PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSLV.L vs. 8PSG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSLV.L vs. 8PSG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) and Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SSLV.L is traded in USD, while 8PSG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 8PSG.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSLV.L achieves a -5.65% return, which is significantly lower than 8PSG.DE's 1.53% return.


SSLV.L

1D
5.76%
1M
-20.67%
YTD
-5.65%
6M
9.69%
1Y
86.40%
3Y*
41.36%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*
14.25%

8PSG.DE

1D
0.69%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
1.53%
6M
4.30%
1Y
31.64%
3Y*
31.51%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSLV.L vs. 8PSG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SSLV.L
Invesco Physical Silver ETC
-5.65%147.68%21.09%-0.91%3.59%-12.95%57.89%
8PSG.DE
Invesco Physical Gold ETC
1.53%68.18%26.61%12.89%1.11%-4.38%16.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SSLV.L and 8PSG.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020

0.69

The correlation between SSLV.L and 8PSG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSLV.L vs. 8PSG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSLV.L
SSLV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SSLV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

8PSG.DE
8PSG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSLV.L vs. 8PSG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) and Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSLV.L8PSG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.88

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

4.79

-0.46

SSLV.L vs. 8PSG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSLV.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the 8PSG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSLV.L and 8PSG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSLV.L vs. 8PSG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSLV.L drawdown since its inception was -76.61%, which is greater than 8PSG.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSLV.L and 8PSG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSLV.L8PSG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.61%

-21.38%

-55.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.86%

-17.16%

-26.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.86%

-17.16%

-26.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.86%

-21.38%

-22.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.62%

-15.62%

-25.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.75%

-6.92%

-46.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.72%

6.75%

+12.97%

Volatility

SSLV.L vs. 8PSG.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) has a higher volatility of 15.66% compared to Invesco Physical Gold ETC (8PSG.DE) at 5.66%. This indicates that SSLV.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 8PSG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSLV.L8PSG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.66%

5.66%

+10.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.80%

21.07%

+33.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.67%

24.33%

+33.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.79%

17.32%

+18.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.03%

17.49%

+13.54%

SSLV.L vs. 8PSG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSLV.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than 8PSG.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSLV.L vs. 8PSG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSLV.L nor 8PSG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SSLV.L and 8PSG.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 8PSG.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

8PSG.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SSLV.L.

SSLV.L is categorized as Silver, while 8PSG.DE is Gold. SSLV.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while 8PSG.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for SSLV.L and 0.12% for 8PSG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSLV.L and 8PSG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer