SSHFX vs. WBGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sound Shore Fund (SSHFX) and William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX).
SSHFX is managed by Sound Shore. It was launched on May 17, 1985. WBGSX is managed by William Blair. It was launched on Mar 20, 1946.
Performance
SSHFX vs. WBGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSHFX vs. WBGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSHFX Sound Shore Fund | -6.25% | 18.15% | 22.42% | 17.43% | -10.64% | 23.76% | 7.74% | 23.28% | -12.58% | 16.23% |
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund | -14.33% | 10.69% | 85.99% | 37.75% | -29.75% | 21.71% | 36.12% | 32.11% | 4.88% | 24.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSHFX achieves a -6.25% return, which is significantly higher than WBGSX's -14.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SSHFX has underperformed WBGSX with an annualized return of 10.40%, while WBGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.34% annualized return.
SSHFX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- -6.25%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- 12.93%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
WBGSX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- -14.33%
- 6M
- -14.51%
- 1Y
- 8.39%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.76%
- 10Y*
- 17.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSHFX vs. WBGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSHFX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than WBGSX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSHFX vs. WBGSX — Risk / Return Rank
SSHFX
WBGSX
SSHFX vs. WBGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sound Shore Fund (SSHFX) and William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSHFX | WBGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.37 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 0.70 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.23 | +0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | 0.72 | +2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSHFX | WBGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.37 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.46 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.66 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.49 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSHFX and WBGSX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSHFX vs. WBGSX - Dividend Comparison
SSHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.51%, less than WBGSX's 51.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSHFX Sound Shore Fund | 14.51% | 13.60% | 25.89% | 4.51% | 4.76% | 27.20% | 7.86% | 7.61% | 8.35% | 11.83% | 7.14% | 12.42% |
WBGSX William Blair Growth Fund | 51.32% | 43.96% | 69.07% | 12.73% | 4.59% | 14.82% | 15.07% | 10.27% | 38.86% | 38.00% | 8.81% | 13.92% |
Drawdowns
SSHFX vs. WBGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSHFX drawdown since its inception was -52.63%, roughly equal to the maximum WBGSX drawdown of -53.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSHFX and WBGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSHFX | WBGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.63% | -53.05% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -19.70% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.92% | -36.90% | +12.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.91% | -36.90% | -3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.67% | -19.70% | +10.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -11.53% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 6.36% | -2.87% |
Volatility
SSHFX vs. WBGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sound Shore Fund (SSHFX) is 4.73%, while William Blair Growth Fund (WBGSX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that SSHFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WBGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSHFX | WBGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 5.49% | -0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 12.56% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.39% | 22.60% | -5.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 31.93% | -14.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 26.42% | -7.45% |