PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSGFX vs. BLUEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSGFX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sextant Growth Fund (SSGFX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSGFX achieves a 11.65% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SSGFX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 15.15%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.


SSGFX

1D
-0.14%
1M
4.18%
YTD
11.65%
6M
9.75%
1Y
27.81%
3Y*
21.05%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
15.15%

BLUEX

1D
-1.34%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-6.58%
6M
-6.15%
1Y
-6.22%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSGFX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSGFX
Sextant Growth Fund
11.65%16.01%24.45%28.25%-25.30%22.79%30.49%36.39%0.46%16.80%
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
-6.58%4.45%7.24%14.35%-14.30%3.22%34.74%35.34%-4.91%27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between SSGFX and BLUEX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 1991

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between SSGFX and BLUEX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSGFX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSGFX
SSGFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SSGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SSGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BLUEX
BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSGFX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sextant Growth Fund (SSGFX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSGFXBLUEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.90

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

-0.55

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.05

-1.37

+8.41

SSGFX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSGFX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSGFXBLUEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

-0.67

+2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.03

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.57

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.49

+0.01

Drawdowns

SSGFX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSGFX drawdown since its inception was -51.52%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSGFX and BLUEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSGFXBLUEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.52%

-54.27%

+2.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.13%

-12.19%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.07%

-12.19%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.06%

-21.87%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.23%

-29.06%

-1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-8.53%

+8.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-13.37%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

4.85%

-0.74%

Volatility

SSGFX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

Sextant Growth Fund (SSGFX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) have volatilities of 3.65% and 3.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSGFXBLUEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

3.48%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

7.75%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

9.98%

+4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

10.62%

+8.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.45%

16.59%

+2.86%

SSGFX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSGFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSGFX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

SSGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than BLUEX's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
0.33%0.31%0.29%0.03%11.84%27.20%25.43%13.71%13.40%0.00%0.00%0.24%
SSGFX
Sextant Growth Fund
1.47%1.64%2.19%0.00%2.59%8.85%0.58%2.83%5.10%0.63%3.65%8.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSGFX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSGFX has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to BLUEX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSGFX dropped -51.52% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

SSGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSGFX and BLUEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer