SSGFX vs. SPUS
SSGFX (Sextant Growth Fund) and SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) are both funds - SSGFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Sextant Mutual Funds, while SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. Over the past 5 years, SSGFX returned 9.53%/yr vs 14.52%/yr for SPUS. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SSGFX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPUS.
Performance
SSGFX vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSGFX achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 10.68% return.
SSGFX
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 13.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.53%
- 10Y*
- 14.02%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.10%
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 25.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.25M | $21.17M | $26.78M | |
SSGFX Sextant Growth Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SSGFX vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSGFX Sextant Growth Fund | 5.78% | 16.01% | 24.45% | 28.25% | -25.30% | 22.79% | 30.49% | 1.05% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 10.68% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSGFX and SPUS is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between SSGFX and SPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSGFX vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
SSGFX
SPUS
SSGFX vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sextant Growth Fund (SSGFX) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSGFX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.26 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 2.19 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.48 | 7.52 | -5.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSGFX vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSGFX drawdown since its inception was -51.52%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSGFX and SPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSGFX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.52% | -30.80% | -20.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.13% | -10.66% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.07% | -22.82% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.06% | -28.06% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.39% | -5.26% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.10% | -6.17% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 3.10% | +1.57% |
Volatility
SSGFX vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
Sextant Growth Fund (SSGFX) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 4.66%. This indicates that SSGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSGFX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 4.66% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.43% | 12.81% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.62% | 15.89% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 19.49% | -0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 21.26% | -1.73% |
SSGFX vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSGFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSGFX vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
SSGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than SPUS's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSGFX Sextant Growth Fund | 1.55% | 1.64% | 2.19% | 0.00% | 2.59% | 8.85% | 0.58% | 2.83% | 5.10% | 0.63% | 3.65% | 8.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, SSGFX and SPUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SSGFX has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to SPUS (4.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSGFX dropped -51.52% vs SPUS's -30.80%.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSGFX and SPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer