SSG vs. SSO
SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) and SSO (ProShares Ultra S&P500) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - SSG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%) while SSO tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSG returned -62.09%/yr vs 24.26%/yr for SSO. At a correlation of -0.74, they often move in opposite directions. SSG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SSO.
Performance
SSG vs. SSO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -58.97% return, which is significantly lower than SSO's 12.95% return. Over the past 10 years, SSG has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of -62.09%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.26% annualized return.
SSG
- 1D
- 12.02%
- 1M
- -11.92%
- YTD
- -58.97%
- 6M
- -57.87%
- 1Y
- -78.94%
- 3Y*
- -74.04%
- 5Y*
- -66.24%
- 10Y*
- -62.09%
SSO
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 6M
- 10.86%
- 1Y
- 42.28%
- 3Y*
- 33.83%
- 5Y*
- 17.91%
- 10Y*
- 24.26%
SSG vs. SSO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -58.97% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | 37.90% | -67.46% | -76.50% | -63.33% | -0.79% | -51.60% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 12.95% | 26.19% | 43.48% | 46.65% | -38.98% | 60.57% | 21.54% | 63.45% | -14.60% | 44.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSG and SSO is -0.72, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | -0.74 |
The correlation between SSG and SSO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.78 to -0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSG vs. SSO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSG
SSO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SSG
SSO
Basic Materials
SSG
-
SSO
Communication Services
SSG
-
SSO
Consumer Cyclical
SSG
-
SSO
Consumer Defensive
SSG
-
SSO
Energy
SSG
-
SSO
Healthcare
SSG
-
SSO
Industrials
SSG
-
SSO
Real Estate
SSG
-
SSO
Technology
SSG
-
SSO
Utilities
SSG
-
SSO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSG vs. SSO — Risk / Return Rank
SSG
SSO
SSG vs. SSO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.72 | 1.30 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 2.34 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 9.90 | -11.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSG vs. SSO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and SSO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -84.67% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.92% | -18.17% | -61.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.56% | -35.21% | -63.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.66% | -46.73% | -52.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | -59.34% | -40.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -6.70% | -93.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.60% | -19.53% | -69.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.14% | 4.28% | +46.86% |
Volatility
SSG vs. SSO - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a higher volatility of 33.37% compared to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) at 9.70%. This indicates that SSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSG | SSO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.37% | 9.70% | +23.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.63% | 19.65% | +34.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.68% | 24.92% | +43.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.55% | 33.85% | +44.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.63% | 35.93% | +33.70% |
SSG vs. SSO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSG vs. SSO - Dividend Comparison
SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, more than SSO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 12.72% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSO ProShares Ultra S&P500 | 0.65% | 0.68% | 0.85% | 0.18% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.50% | 0.75% | 0.39% | 0.51% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSG and SSO have a correlation of -0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSG has higher volatility (33.37%) compared to SSO (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSG dropped -100.00% vs SSO's -84.67%.
On 10-year performance, SSO leads with 24.26% vs -62.09% for SSG. On fees, SSO is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, SSO has been the lower-risk option at 9.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SSO has performed better with a 24.26% return vs -62.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SSO is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSG.
SSG has the higher dividend yield at 12.72%, compared with 0.65% for SSO.
SSG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while SSO tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSG and 0.87% for SSO.
SSO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSG and SSO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer