SSG vs. SHOC
SSG (Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors) and SHOC (Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while SHOC is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SSG returned -74.69%/yr vs 53.23%/yr for SHOC. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. SSG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SHOC.
Performance
SSG vs. SHOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSG achieves a -58.97% return, which is significantly lower than SHOC's 69.49% return.
SSG
- 1D
- 5.05%
- 1M
- -27.17%
- YTD
- -58.97%
- 6M
- -58.94%
- 1Y
- -79.75%
- 3Y*
- -74.69%
- 5Y*
- -66.61%
- 10Y*
- -61.93%
SHOC
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 18.27%
- YTD
- 69.49%
- 6M
- 67.38%
- 1Y
- 141.70%
- 3Y*
- 53.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSG vs. SHOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | -58.97% | -70.03% | -77.59% | -78.69% | -17.40% |
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 69.49% | 49.91% | 16.74% | 61.97% | -1.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSG and SHOC is -0.91, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022 | -0.94 |
The correlation between SSG and SHOC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSG vs. SHOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSG
SHOC
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SSG
SHOC
-
Basic Materials
SSG
-
SHOC
-
Communication Services
SSG
-
SHOC
-
Consumer Cyclical
SSG
-
SHOC
-
Consumer Defensive
SSG
-
SHOC
-
Energy
SSG
-
SHOC
-
Healthcare
SSG
-
SHOC
-
Industrials
SSG
-
SHOC
-
Real Estate
SSG
-
SHOC
-
Technology
SSG
-
SHOC
Utilities
SSG
-
SHOC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSG vs. SHOC — Risk / Return Rank
SSG
SHOC
SSG vs. SHOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) and Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSG | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.68 | 1.63 | -0.95 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 9.77 | -10.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.57 | 36.29 | -37.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSG | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.29 | 4.52 | -5.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | 1.52 | -2.30 |
Drawdowns
SSG vs. SHOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SHOC's maximum drawdown of -37.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSG and SHOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSG | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -37.54% | -62.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.36% | -14.59% | -66.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.49% | -37.54% | -60.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -2.24% | -97.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.59% | -7.46% | -81.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.76% | 3.92% | +46.84% |
Volatility
SSG vs. SHOC - Volatility Comparison
Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors (SSG) has a higher volatility of 22.29% compared to Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) at 11.67%. This indicates that SSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHOC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSG | SHOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.29% | 11.67% | +10.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.74% | 24.73% | +23.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.84% | 31.56% | +30.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.35% | 35.17% | +42.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.97% | 35.17% | +33.80% |
SSG vs. SHOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SHOC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSG vs. SHOC - Dividend Comparison
SSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.72%, more than SHOC's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.65% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SSG Proshares Ultrashort Semiconductors | 12.72% | 9.19% | 7.67% | 6.73% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.81% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSG and SHOC have a correlation of -0.91, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SSG has higher volatility (22.29%) compared to SHOC (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSG dropped -100.00% vs SHOC's -37.54%.
On 3-year performance, SHOC leads with 53.23% vs -74.69% for SSG. On fees, SHOC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SHOC has been the lower-risk option at 11.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SHOC has performed better with a 53.23% return vs -74.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHOC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSG.
SSG has the higher dividend yield at 12.72%, compared with 0.14% for SHOC.
SSG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SHOC is Semiconductors. SSG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (-200%), while SHOC tracks Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSG and 0.40% for SHOC.
SHOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSG and SHOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer