PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSFI vs. RSBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SSFI vs. RSBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF (SSFI) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SSFI vs. RSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SSFI
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF
-0.11%6.62%1.10%1.31%
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
5.19%10.31%-2.90%-11.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSFI achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than RSBT's 5.19% return.


SSFI

1D
0.43%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
0.72%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
10Y*

RSBT

1D
0.37%
1M
-4.56%
YTD
5.19%
6M
11.52%
1Y
14.67%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SSFI vs. RSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSFI has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SSFI vs. RSBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSFI
SSFI Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SSFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSFI Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SSFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSFI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

RSBT
RSBT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
RSBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSFI vs. RSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF (SSFI) and Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSFIRSBTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.99

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

1.35

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.18

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.72

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.16

3.77

+0.39

SSFI vs. RSBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the RSBT Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSFI and RSBT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSFIRSBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.99

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

-0.02

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between SSFI and RSBT is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SSFI vs. RSBT - Dividend Comparison

SSFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than RSBT's 3.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
SSFI
Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF
3.38%3.51%3.64%3.97%1.87%0.71%
RSBT
Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF
3.04%3.20%0.00%2.38%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SSFI vs. RSBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSFI drawdown since its inception was -16.07%, smaller than the maximum RSBT drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSFI and RSBT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SSFIRSBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.07%

-23.60%

+7.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-8.17%

+5.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-4.56%

+1.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-13.22%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

4.04%

-3.09%

Volatility

SSFI vs. RSBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Day Hagan/Ned Davis Research Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF (SSFI) is 1.60%, while Return Stacked Bonds & Managed Futures ETF (RSBT) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that SSFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SSFIRSBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

3.95%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

11.28%

-8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.59%

14.95%

-10.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.82%

13.90%

-8.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.82%

13.90%

-8.08%