PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSFDX vs. BIMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSFDX vs. BIMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSFDX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than BIMIX's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SSFDX has underperformed BIMIX with an annualized return of -19.41%, while BIMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.15% annualized return.


SSFDX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.41%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
-19.41%

BIMIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.15%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
2.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSFDX vs. BIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSFDX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.37%6.80%1.36%5.39%-13.36%-1.98%-89.24%8.98%-0.20%3.29%
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
-0.06%6.69%3.45%5.78%-8.64%-1.41%7.42%7.05%0.58%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SSFDX and BIMIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2014

0.90

The correlation between SSFDX and BIMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSFDX vs. BIMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSFDX
SSFDX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
SSFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SSFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BIMIX
BIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSFDX vs. BIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSFDXBIMIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

1.55

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

2.31

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

1.95

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.85

5.74

+0.11

SSFDX vs. BIMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the BIMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSFDX and BIMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSFDXBIMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.55

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.31

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.61

0.66

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.56

1.17

-1.73

Drawdowns

SSFDX vs. BIMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSFDX drawdown since its inception was -92.69%, which is greater than BIMIX's maximum drawdown of -12.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSFDX and BIMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSFDXBIMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.69%

-12.76%

-79.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.07%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.13%

-2.44%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.19%

-12.76%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.69%

-12.76%

-79.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.13%

-1.32%

-88.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.02%

-1.48%

-46.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.70%

+0.20%

Volatility

SSFDX vs. BIMIX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX) at 0.76%. This indicates that SSFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSFDXBIMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

0.76%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

1.72%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

2.49%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

3.88%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.82%

3.25%

+28.57%

SSFDX vs. BIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSFDX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BIMIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSFDX vs. BIMIX - Dividend Comparison

SSFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, more than BIMIX's 3.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
3.72%3.67%3.89%3.21%2.17%2.27%3.49%2.52%2.50%2.35%2.21%2.57%
SSFDX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund
4.06%3.64%3.59%2.95%2.27%3.12%8.84%3.15%2.79%2.43%2.19%4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SSFDX and BIMIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSFDX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to BIMIX (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSFDX dropped -92.69% vs BIMIX's -12.76%.

BIMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSFDX and BIMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer