PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSFDX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSFDX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSFDX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SSFDX has underperformed BND with an annualized return of 1.45%, while BND has yielded a comparatively higher 1.55% annualized return.


SSFDX

1D
0.27%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.62%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
-0.14%
10Y*
1.45%

BND

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.38%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
1.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSFDX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSFDX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund
0.62%6.80%1.36%5.39%-13.36%-1.98%7.57%8.98%-0.20%3.29%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
0.38%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SSFDX and BND is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2014

0.94

The correlation between SSFDX and BND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSFDX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSFDX
SSFDX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SSFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SSFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSFDX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSFDXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

1.64

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.03

4.69

+0.35

SSFDX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSFDX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSFDX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSFDX drawdown since its inception was -26.93%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSFDX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSFDXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.93%

-18.58%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.75%

-2.68%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.13%

-5.92%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.19%

-17.91%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.93%

-18.58%

-8.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-2.26%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-3.06%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.93%

+0.03%

Volatility

SSFDX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund (SSFDX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.08%. This indicates that SSFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSFDXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

1.08%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

2.77%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

3.74%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

6.03%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.11%

5.54%

+8.57%

SSFDX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSFDX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSFDX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

SSFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than BND's 3.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.96%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
SSFDX
State Street Aggregate Bond Index Fund
4.10%3.64%3.59%2.95%2.27%3.12%3.00%3.15%2.79%2.43%2.19%4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, SSFDX and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SSFDX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to BND (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSFDX dropped -26.93% vs BND's -18.58%.

SSFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSFDX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer