PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSEYX vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSEYX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio (SSEYX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSEYX achieves a 10.88% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SSEYX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 15.49%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.60% annualized return.


SSEYX

1D
-0.73%
1M
4.17%
YTD
10.88%
6M
10.51%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
22.33%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%

VONG

1D
0.21%
1M
5.36%
YTD
7.40%
6M
6.54%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
25.06%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
18.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSEYX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSEYX
State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio
10.88%17.52%25.01%26.29%-18.18%28.58%18.28%31.42%-4.54%21.72%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
7.40%18.45%33.20%42.67%-29.18%27.60%38.30%36.06%-1.53%30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SSEYX and VONG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2014

0.94

The correlation between SSEYX and VONG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSEYX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSEYX
SSEYX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SSEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SSEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSEYX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio (SSEYX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSEYXVONGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.29

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

1.58

+1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.62

5.29

+9.33

SSEYX vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSEYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSEYX and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSEYXVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.67

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.73

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.89

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.90

-0.11

Drawdowns

SSEYX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSEYX drawdown since its inception was -33.75%, roughly equal to the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSEYX and VONG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSEYXVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.75%

-32.72%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.88%

-16.23%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-23.27%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

-32.72%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.75%

-32.72%

-1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-1.46%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-4.88%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

4.84%

-2.94%

Volatility

SSEYX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio (SSEYX) is 2.92%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that SSEYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSEYXVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.59%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

11.61%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.87%

15.36%

-3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.91%

21.33%

-4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.06%

20.87%

-2.81%

SSEYX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSEYX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSEYX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

SSEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than VONG's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSEYX
State Street Equity 500 Index II Portfolio
1.25%1.38%1.93%1.46%1.57%2.48%3.63%2.36%5.91%5.37%2.29%3.47%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.43%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SSEYX and VONG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VONG has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to SSEYX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSEYX dropped -33.75% vs VONG's -32.72%.

SSEYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSEYX and VONG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer