SSCPX vs. RFIMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SSCPX (Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio) and RFIMX (Ranger Micro Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SSCPX returned 7.56%/yr vs 3.44%/yr for RFIMX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSCPX charges 1.70%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for RFIMX.

Performance

SSCPX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCPX achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly higher than RFIMX's 14.50% return.

SSCPX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 19.85%
• 6M: 19.05%
• 1Y: 34.64%
• 3Y*: 17.42%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

RFIMX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 14.50%
• 6M: 14.88%
• 1Y: 27.49%
• 3Y*: 7.90%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCPX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	19.85%	6.41%	10.79%	15.16%	-17.56%	24.53%	25.39%	23.71%	-1.32%
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund	14.50%	1.99%	11.52%	9.14%	-24.26%	30.58%	44.44%	24.94%	-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCPX and RFIMX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2018	0.86

The correlation between SSCPX and RFIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SSCPX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCPX

SSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 44
SSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
SSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
SSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
SSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

RFIMX

RFIMX Risk / Return Rank: 33
RFIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RFIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
RFIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
RFIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
RFIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCPX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SSCPX	RFIMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	1.43	+0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	2.11	+0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.24	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	2.89	+0.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.25	8.17	+2.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSCPX vs. RFIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the RFIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCPX and RFIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SSCPX	RFIMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	1.43	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.00	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.00	+0.39

Drawdowns

SSCPX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCPX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, smaller than the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCPX and RFIMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSCPX	RFIMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.65%	-99.41%	+45.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-9.11%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.78%	-99.41%	+71.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.78%	-99.41%	+71.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-99.13%	+99.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.25%	-29.22%	+18.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	3.23%	+0.15%

Volatility

SSCPX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) have volatilities of 5.76% and 5.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSCPX	RFIMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.76%	5.70%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.54%	13.64%	+0.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.64%	19.12%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.17%	5,369.96%	-5,347.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.99%	4,403.88%	-4,380.89%

SSCPX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCPX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSCPX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison

SSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%, more than RFIMX's 1.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund	1.16%	1.33%	0.00%	0.77%	47.82%	71.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	7.52%	9.02%	11.37%	0.00%	10.18%	24.67%	0.02%	0.00%	17.42%	0.00%	0.00%	58.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSCPX and RFIMX in my portfolio?

SSCPX and RFIMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSCPX or RFIMX?

SSCPX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to RFIMX (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCPX dropped -53.65% vs RFIMX's -99.41%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.