PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCPX vs. MAGKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCPX vs. MAGKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Mutual of America Small Cap Growth Fund (MAGKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCPX achieves a 25.40% return, which is significantly higher than MAGKX's 21.35% return.


SSCPX

1D
-1.38%
1M
6.71%
YTD
25.40%
6M
22.02%
1Y
36.96%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
11.94%

MAGKX

1D
-1.70%
1M
4.36%
YTD
21.35%
6M
17.69%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
3.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCPX vs. MAGKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SSCPX
Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio
25.40%6.41%10.79%15.16%-17.56%24.53%25.39%
MAGKX
Mutual of America Small Cap Growth Fund
21.35%8.45%9.91%15.22%-28.37%9.68%1,092.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCPX and MAGKX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.81

The correlation between SSCPX and MAGKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCPX vs. MAGKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCPX
SSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGKX
MAGKX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MAGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCPX vs. MAGKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Mutual of America Small Cap Growth Fund (MAGKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSCPXMAGKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

4.14

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.48

16.07

-4.59

SSCPX vs. MAGKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the MAGKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCPX and MAGKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSCPX vs. MAGKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCPX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, which is greater than MAGKX's maximum drawdown of -41.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCPX and MAGKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCPXMAGKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.65%

-41.67%

-11.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.54%

-9.81%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.78%

-24.90%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.78%

-41.67%

+13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-1.70%

+0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.23%

-19.70%

+9.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.45%

+0.94%

Volatility

SSCPX vs. MAGKX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Mutual of America Small Cap Growth Fund (MAGKX) have volatilities of 6.42% and 6.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCPXMAGKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.42%

6.45%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

15.64%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.30%

20.32%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.23%

27.77%

-5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.02%

384.07%

-361.05%

SSCPX vs. MAGKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCPX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGKX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSCPX vs. MAGKX - Dividend Comparison

SSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than MAGKX's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAGKX
Mutual of America Small Cap Growth Fund
0.78%0.94%1.62%0.00%5.47%17.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSCPX
Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio
7.19%9.02%11.37%0.00%10.18%24.67%0.02%0.00%17.42%0.00%0.00%58.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSCPX and MAGKX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAGKX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to SSCPX (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCPX dropped -53.65% vs MAGKX's -41.67%.

MAGKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCPX and MAGKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer