SSCP vs. GRPZ
SSCP (SMART Small Cap ETF) and GRPZ (Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. SSCP is actively managed, while GRPZ is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSCP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GRPZ.
Performance
SSCP vs. GRPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SSCP
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRPZ
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 7.41%
- 6M
- 15.30%
- YTD
- 22.66%
- 1Y
- 27.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSCP vs. GRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SSCP SMART Small Cap ETF | 2.90% |
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF | 8.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSCP and GRPZ is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSCP vs. GRPZ — Risk / Return Rank
SSCP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GRPZ
SSCP vs. GRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Small Cap ETF (SSCP) and Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSCP | GRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.93 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSCP vs. GRPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSCP drawdown since its inception was -4.50%, smaller than the maximum GRPZ drawdown of -27.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCP and GRPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSCP | GRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -27.87% | +23.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -0.96% | -1.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -6.67% | +5.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.31% | — |
Volatility
SSCP vs. GRPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSCP | GRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.19% | 17.56% | +1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 20.86% | -1.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 20.86% | -1.67% |
SSCP vs. GRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSCP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GRPZ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSCP vs. GRPZ - Dividend Comparison
SSCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GRPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GRPZ Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF | 0.88% | 0.97% | 0.73% |
SSCP SMART Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSCP and GRPZ have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRPZ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRPZ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SSCP.
GRPZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for SSCP.
They also come from different issuers: SmartWay ETFs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SSCP and 0.35% for GRPZ.
Find the right allocation for SSCP and GRPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer