SSAC.L vs. WQDV.L
SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and WQDV.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - SSAC.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Index while WQDV.L tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSAC.L returned 12.18%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for WQDV.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for WQDV.L.
Performance
SSAC.L vs. WQDV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSAC.L is traded in GBp, while WQDV.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WQDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than WQDV.L's 14.59% return.
SSAC.L
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- 1Y
- 28.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.18%
- 10Y*
- 13.49%
WQDV.L
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 14.59%
- 6M
- 14.69%
- 1Y
- 31.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- —
SSAC.L vs. WQDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.60% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 16.14% | -8.56% | 20.35% | 11.80% | 22.09% | -4.76% | 4.78% |
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 14.59% | 15.31% | 11.67% | 11.37% | 4.12% | 17.09% | -3.01% | 18.06% | -2.34% | 1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSAC.L and WQDV.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SSAC.L and WQDV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSAC.L vs. WQDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Financial Services
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Industrials
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Consumer Cyclical
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Communication Services
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Healthcare
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Consumer Defensive
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Energy
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Basic Materials
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Utilities
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Real Estate
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSAC.L vs. WQDV.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSAC.L
WQDV.L
SSAC.L vs. WQDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSAC.L | WQDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.49 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 4.59 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.39 | 16.93 | -1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSAC.L vs. WQDV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than WQDV.L's maximum drawdown of -24.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and WQDV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSAC.L | WQDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -24.64% | -18.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -6.65% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.01% | -14.78% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.01% | -14.78% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | 0.00% | -1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -2.98% | -6.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.81% | -0.03% |
Volatility
SSAC.L vs. WQDV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 3.56%, while iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WQDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSAC.L | WQDV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 4.01% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 9.17% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 11.56% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 12.66% | +6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 14.11% | +3.17% |
SSAC.L vs. WQDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WQDV.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
SSAC.L vs. WQDV.L - Dividend Comparison
SSAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WQDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.81% | 2.31% | 2.58% | 2.78% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.81% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSAC.L and WQDV.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SSAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SSAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDV.L.
SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index, while WQDV.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.38% for WQDV.L.
Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and WQDV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer