WQDV.L vs. IMID.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L).
WQDV.L and IMID.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WQDV.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2017. IMID.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 13, 2011. Both WQDV.L and IMID.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WQDV.L or IMID.L.
Key characteristics
| WQDV.L | IMID.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 14.94% | 14.36% |
| 1Y Return | 24.02% | 23.14% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.60% | 5.82% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.17% | 11.06% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.12 | 1.91 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.45% | 12.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.13% | -39.56% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.03% | -0.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQDV.L and IMID.L is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WQDV.L vs. IMID.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WQDV.L having a 14.94% return and IMID.L slightly lower at 14.36%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WQDV.L vs. IMID.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQDV.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IMID.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WQDV.L vs. IMID.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WQDV.L vs. IMID.L - Dividend Comparison
WQDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while IMID.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WQDV.L iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.47% | 2.78% | 2.95% | 2.75% | 2.81% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 0.77% |
IMID.L SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WQDV.L vs. IMID.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQDV.L drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum IMID.L drawdown of -39.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQDV.L and IMID.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WQDV.L vs. IMID.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDV.L) is 3.02%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI (IMID.L) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that WQDV.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.