SSAC.L vs. ACWI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L).
SSAC.L and ACWI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SSAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. ACWI.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on May 13, 2011. Both SSAC.L and ACWI.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SSAC.L vs. ACWI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSAC.L vs. ACWI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | -0.51% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 16.14% | -8.56% | 20.35% | 11.80% | 22.09% | -4.79% | 13.30% |
ACWI.L SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF | -0.49% | 14.32% | 19.66% | 15.59% | -8.59% | 20.28% | 11.89% | 21.92% | -4.58% | 12.93% |
Different Trading Currencies
SSAC.L is traded in GBp, while ACWI.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ACWI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SSAC.L having a -0.51% return and ACWI.L slightly higher at -0.49%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SSAC.L having a 12.30% annualized return and ACWI.L not far ahead at 12.34%.
SSAC.L
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 18.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
ACWI.L
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 18.59%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSAC.L vs. ACWI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSAC.L vs. ACWI.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSAC.L
ACWI.L
SSAC.L vs. ACWI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSAC.L | ACWI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 1.82 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.65 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.89 | 9.83 | +0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSAC.L | ACWI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.31 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.81 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.75 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSAC.L and ACWI.L is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSAC.L vs. ACWI.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSAC.L nor ACWI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SSAC.L vs. ACWI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, roughly equal to the maximum ACWI.L drawdown of -25.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and ACWI.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSAC.L | ACWI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -25.44% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | -10.47% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.99% | -18.07% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | -25.44% | +0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.04% | -4.06% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -3.70% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.90% | -0.04% |
Volatility
SSAC.L vs. ACWI.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSAC.L | ACWI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 4.59% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.34% | 8.34% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.03% | 14.14% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.02% | 13.08% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 14.39% | -0.01% |