SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and JPLG.L (JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, from iShares and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SSAC.L returned 12.57%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for JPLG.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than JPLG.L's 10.77% return.

SSAC.L

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 5.29%
• YTD: 11.86%
• 6M: 12.38%
• 1Y: 30.00%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: 12.57%
• 10Y*: 13.47%

JPLG.L

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 10.77%
• 6M: 11.42%
• 1Y: 22.95%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)	11.86%	13.95%	19.63%	16.14%	-8.56%	20.35%	11.80%	0.69%
JPLG.L JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating	10.77%	10.11%	12.09%	7.05%	0.72%	24.67%	2.57%	-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SSAC.L and JPLG.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between SSAC.L and JPLG.L has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SSAC.L	JPLG.L
Technology	31.1%	10.7%
Financial Services	15.7%	11.3%
Industrials	10.4%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	7.9%
Communication Services	8.9%	5.8%
Healthcare	8.0%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	8.4%
Energy	4.2%	8.4%
Basic Materials	3.6%	8.1%
Utilities	2.4%	9.3%
Real Estate	1.7%	7.5%

Return for Risk

SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSAC.L

SSAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SSAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
SSAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SSAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SSAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

JPLG.L

JPLG.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
JPLG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
JPLG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
JPLG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
JPLG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SSAC.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.90	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	3.98	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.52	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.26	4.09	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.20	15.27	+1.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSAC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the JPLG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSAC.L and JPLG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SSAC.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	2.90	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	0.95	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.69	+0.20

Drawdowns

SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum JPLG.L drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and JPLG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSAC.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.43%	-27.53%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.01%	-5.59%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.99%	-13.65%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.99%	-13.65%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.43%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	0.00%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-3.30%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	1.50%	+0.24%

Volatility

SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to JPMorgan Global Equity Multi-Factor UCITS ETF Accumulating (JPLG.L) at 1.96%. This indicates that SSAC.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSAC.L	JPLG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	1.96%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.73%	5.88%	+1.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.48%	7.87%	+2.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.98%	10.90%	+2.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.38%	13.75%	+0.63%

SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SSAC.L and JPLG.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SSAC.L vs. JPLG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SSAC.L nor JPLG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSAC.L and JPLG.L in my portfolio?

SSAC.L and JPLG.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SSAC.L or JPLG.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSAC.L or JPLG.L?

SSAC.L and JPLG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

What is the main difference between SSAC.L and JPLG.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan.