SSAC.L vs. IUIT.L
SSAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IUIT.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SSAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IUIT.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L returned 13.64%/yr vs 27.67%/yr for IUIT.L. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SSAC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUIT.L.
Performance
SSAC.L vs. IUIT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSAC.L is traded in GBp, while IUIT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUIT.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSAC.L achieves a 11.92% return, which is significantly lower than IUIT.L's 26.17% return. Over the past 10 years, SSAC.L has underperformed IUIT.L with an annualized return of 13.64%, while IUIT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.67% annualized return.
SSAC.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 5.84%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
IUIT.L
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 18.21%
- YTD
- 26.17%
- 6M
- 24.98%
- 1Y
- 57.16%
- 3Y*
- 32.13%
- 5Y*
- 26.05%
- 10Y*
- 27.67%
SSAC.L vs. IUIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) | 11.92% | 13.95% | 19.63% | 16.14% | -8.56% | 20.35% | 11.80% | 22.09% | -4.79% | 13.30% |
IUIT.L iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF | 26.17% | 14.17% | 40.92% | 51.48% | -20.73% | 35.36% | 38.94% | 43.23% | 4.43% | 25.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSAC.L and IUIT.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2015 | 0.77 |
The correlation between SSAC.L and IUIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
SSAC.L vs. IUIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
Financial Services
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
-
Industrials
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
Consumer Cyclical
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
-
Communication Services
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
-
Healthcare
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
-
Energy
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
Basic Materials
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
-
Utilities
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
-
Real Estate
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSAC.L vs. IUIT.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSAC.L
IUIT.L
SSAC.L vs. IUIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSAC.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.46 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 3.35 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | 8.51 | +8.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSAC.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 2.81 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 1.14 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | 1.26 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.24 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
SSAC.L vs. IUIT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSAC.L drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum IUIT.L drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSAC.L and IUIT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSAC.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -28.01% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -16.96% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.99% | -28.01% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.99% | -28.01% | +10.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.43% | -28.01% | +2.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.78% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -5.29% | +1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | 6.70% | -4.96% |
Volatility
SSAC.L vs. IUIT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) is 2.89%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (IUIT.L) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that SSAC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSAC.L | IUIT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 7.14% | -4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.73% | 15.20% | -7.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 20.31% | -9.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 22.82% | -9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 22.51% | -8.13% |
SSAC.L vs. IUIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSAC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IUIT.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSAC.L vs. IUIT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SSAC.L nor IUIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SSAC.L and IUIT.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUIT.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUIT.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSAC.L.
SSAC.L is categorized as Global Equities, while IUIT.L is Technology Equities. SSAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while IUIT.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSAC.L and 0.15% for IUIT.L.
Find the right allocation for SSAC.L and IUIT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer