SRVR vs. COWZ
SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRVR returned -0.81%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for COWZ. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRVR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
SRVR vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.18% return.
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 20.69%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 19.79% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 41.98% | -3.51% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.18% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRVR and COWZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018 | 0.47 |
The correlation between SRVR and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SRVR vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRVR
COWZ
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
Utilities
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
SRVR
COWZ
-
Industrials
SRVR
COWZ
Communication Services
SRVR
COWZ
Technology
SRVR
COWZ
Energy
SRVR
COWZ
Utilities
SRVR
COWZ
-
Financial Services
SRVR
COWZ
-
Basic Materials
SRVR
COWZ
Consumer Cyclical
SRVR
-
COWZ
Consumer Defensive
SRVR
-
COWZ
Healthcare
SRVR
-
COWZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRVR vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
SRVR
COWZ
SRVR vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRVR | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.36 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 4.46 | -3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 12.19 | -10.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRVR | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 2.02 | -1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.60 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.65 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
SRVR vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRVR | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -38.63% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.78% | -5.00% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | -22.00% | +3.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -22.00% | -18.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.28% | -0.91% | -11.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.27% | -4.81% | -10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 1.83% | +5.00% |
Volatility
SRVR vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.56%. This indicates that SRVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRVR | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 2.56% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 7.12% | +6.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 11.13% | +5.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 17.63% | +2.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 19.93% | +1.51% |
SRVR vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRVR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRVR vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than COWZ's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.99% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.70% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRVR and COWZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.57% vs -0.81% for SRVR. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.99% for COWZ.
SRVR is categorized as REIT, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SRVR and 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRVR and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer