PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRVR vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRVR vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.18% return.


SRVR

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
19.79%
6M
20.69%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*

COWZ

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.03%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRVR vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
19.79%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%11.99%41.98%-3.51%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.18%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between SRVR and COWZ is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.47

The correlation between SRVR and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SRVR vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRVR
COWZ

Real Estate

66.4%

-

Industrials

11.7%
8.4%

Communication Services

7.5%
10.4%

Technology

6.8%
16.0%

Energy

3.8%
16.9%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Financial Services

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.8%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.9%

Healthcare

-

21.8%

Real Estate

SRVR
66.4%
COWZ

-

Industrials

SRVR
11.7%
COWZ
8.4%

Communication Services

SRVR
7.5%
COWZ
10.4%

Technology

SRVR
6.8%
COWZ
16.0%

Energy

SRVR
3.8%
COWZ
16.9%

Utilities

SRVR
2.2%
COWZ

-

Financial Services

SRVR
0.9%
COWZ

-

Basic Materials

SRVR
0.8%
COWZ
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SRVR

-

COWZ
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

SRVR

-

COWZ
10.9%

Healthcare

SRVR

-

COWZ
21.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRVR vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRVR vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRVRCOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.36

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

4.46

-3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

12.19

-10.55

SRVR vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRVR and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRVRCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

2.02

-1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.60

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.65

-0.35

Drawdowns

SRVR vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRVRCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.99%

-38.63%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-5.00%

-9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-22.00%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

-22.00%

-18.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.28%

-0.91%

-11.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.27%

-4.81%

-10.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.83%

1.83%

+5.00%

Volatility

SRVR vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.56%. This indicates that SRVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRVRCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

2.56%

+2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

7.12%

+6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

11.13%

+5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

17.63%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.44%

19.93%

+1.51%

SRVR vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRVR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRVR vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than COWZ's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.99%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.70%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRVR and COWZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.57% vs -0.81% for SRVR. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.57% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.99% for COWZ.

SRVR is categorized as REIT, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SRVR and 0.49% for COWZ.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRVR and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer