SRV vs. VGELX
SRV (NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund) and VGELX (Vanguard Energy Fund Admiral Shares) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SRV returned 12.16%/yr vs 9.18%/yr for VGELX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRV charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for VGELX.
Performance
SRV vs. VGELX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRV achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly higher than VGELX's 16.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SRV has outperformed VGELX with an annualized return of 12.16%, while VGELX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.18% annualized return.
SRV
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 31.90%
- 6M
- 35.27%
- 1Y
- 41.53%
- 3Y*
- 29.19%
- 5Y*
- 25.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.16%
VGELX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- 16.66%
- 6M
- 17.04%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
SRV vs. VGELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 31.90% | 5.05% | 50.70% | 19.88% | 20.11% | 50.45% | -41.65% | 33.99% | -21.61% | -4.21% |
VGELX Vanguard Energy Fund Admiral Shares | 16.66% | 20.76% | 30.46% | 8.87% | 23.70% | 27.80% | -30.80% | 13.32% | -17.12% | 3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRV and VGELX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007 | 0.47 |
The correlation between SRV and VGELX shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRV vs. VGELX — Risk / Return Rank
SRV
VGELX
SRV vs. VGELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) and Vanguard Energy Fund Admiral Shares (VGELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRV | VGELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.36 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 3.23 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 12.40 | -3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRV vs. VGELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRV drawdown since its inception was -92.97%, which is greater than VGELX's maximum drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRV and VGELX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRV | VGELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.97% | -65.22% | -27.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.13% | -7.86% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.26% | -12.30% | -13.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | -19.72% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.70% | -61.13% | -20.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -6.97% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.65% | -19.11% | -29.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.61% | 2.05% | +2.56% |
Volatility
SRV vs. VGELX - Volatility Comparison
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Vanguard Energy Fund Admiral Shares (VGELX) at 3.91%. This indicates that SRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRV | VGELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.42% | 3.91% | +3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.76% | 10.28% | +5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 12.28% | +7.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 18.69% | +7.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.30% | 23.18% | +15.12% |
SRV vs. VGELX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VGELX's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRV vs. VGELX - Dividend Comparison
SRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.66%, more than VGELX's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 15.66% | 19.31% | 12.85% | 15.56% | 8.85% | 4.72% | 12.05% | 10.59% | 12.73% | 9.07% | 7.95% | 11.01% |
VGELX Vanguard Energy Fund Admiral Shares | 7.41% | 4.79% | 34.15% | 6.91% | 4.71% | 3.70% | 4.54% | 3.38% | 3.07% | 3.05% | 1.91% | 2.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRV and VGELX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRV has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to VGELX (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRV dropped -92.97% vs VGELX's -65.22%.
SRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRV and VGELX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer