PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRV vs. VENAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRV vs. VENAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) and Vanguard Energy Index Fund Admiral Shares (VENAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRV achieves a 31.90% return, which is significantly higher than VENAX's 22.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SRV has outperformed VENAX with an annualized return of 12.16%, while VENAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.77% annualized return.


SRV

1D
0.41%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
31.90%
6M
35.27%
1Y
41.53%
3Y*
29.19%
5Y*
25.87%
10Y*
12.16%

VENAX

1D
1.29%
1M
-8.51%
YTD
22.81%
6M
23.30%
1Y
30.20%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
18.73%
10Y*
8.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRV vs. VENAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRV
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund
31.90%5.05%50.70%19.88%20.11%50.45%-41.65%33.99%-21.61%-4.21%
VENAX
Vanguard Energy Index Fund Admiral Shares
22.81%7.29%6.57%0.05%62.94%55.57%-33.27%9.36%-19.90%-2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SRV and VENAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2007

0.48

The correlation between SRV and VENAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.57 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRV vs. VENAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRV
SRV Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VENAX
VENAX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VENAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VENAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VENAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
VENAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
VENAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRV vs. VENAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) and Vanguard Energy Index Fund Admiral Shares (VENAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRVVENAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.22

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

1.89

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.03

5.92

+3.11

SRV vs. VENAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRV Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the VENAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRV and VENAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRV vs. VENAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRV drawdown since its inception was -92.97%, which is greater than VENAX's maximum drawdown of -74.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRV and VENAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRVVENAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.97%

-74.42%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.13%

-14.22%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.26%

-21.44%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.26%

-26.59%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.70%

-69.58%

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.98%

-13.11%

+5.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.65%

-19.96%

-28.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

4.58%

+0.03%

Volatility

SRV vs. VENAX - Volatility Comparison

NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a higher volatility of 7.42% compared to Vanguard Energy Index Fund Admiral Shares (VENAX) at 7.05%. This indicates that SRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VENAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRVVENAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

7.05%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

16.66%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

20.86%

-1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.44%

26.40%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.30%

30.26%

+8.04%

SRV vs. VENAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VENAX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRV vs. VENAX - Dividend Comparison

SRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.66%, more than VENAX's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SRV
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund
15.66%19.31%12.85%15.56%8.85%4.72%12.05%10.59%12.73%9.07%7.95%11.01%
VENAX
Vanguard Energy Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.56%3.10%3.24%3.34%3.65%3.80%4.76%3.41%3.35%2.90%2.31%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRV and VENAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRV has higher volatility (7.42%) compared to VENAX (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRV dropped -92.97% vs VENAX's -74.42%.

SRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRV and VENAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer