SRUUF vs. SSLV.L
SRUUF (Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund) and SSLV.L (Invesco Physical Silver ETC) are both funds - SRUUF is a Commodities fund actively managed by Sprott, while SSLV.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. SRUUF is actively managed, while SSLV.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SRUUF returned 14.39%/yr vs 45.99%/yr for SSLV.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRUUF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SSLV.L.
Performance
SRUUF vs. SSLV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRUUF achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than SSLV.L's 2.90% return.
SRUUF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 20.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SSLV.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 29.12%
- 1Y
- 113.89%
- 3Y*
- 45.99%
- 5Y*
- 21.31%
- 10Y*
- 15.85%
SRUUF vs. SSLV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | 0.42% | 12.66% | -18.89% | 82.09% | 7.65% | 17.26% |
SSLV.L Invesco Physical Silver ETC | 2.90% | 147.68% | 21.10% | -0.93% | 3.59% | -8.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRUUF and SSLV.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SRUUF and SSLV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRUUF vs. SSLV.L — Risk / Return Rank
SRUUF
SSLV.L
SRUUF vs. SSLV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) and Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRUUF | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 2.79 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 6.08 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRUUF | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.99 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.11 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
SRUUF vs. SSLV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRUUF drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, smaller than the maximum SSLV.L drawdown of -74.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRUUF and SSLV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRUUF | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.68% | -74.62% | +25.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.98% | -40.61% | +17.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.68% | -40.61% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.99% | -35.24% | +13.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.79% | -52.25% | +30.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.35% | 18.65% | -7.30% |
Volatility
SRUUF vs. SSLV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) is 7.75%, while Invesco Physical Silver ETC (SSLV.L) has a volatility of 17.44%. This indicates that SRUUF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRUUF | SSLV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 17.44% | -9.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.49% | 54.09% | -29.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.43% | 56.84% | -22.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.79% | 35.50% | +6.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.79% | 30.89% | +10.90% |
SRUUF vs. SSLV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRUUF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLV.L's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRUUF vs. SSLV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SRUUF nor SSLV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SRUUF and SSLV.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SRUUF and SSLV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer