SRTY vs. VB
SRTY (ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRTY is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRTY returned -43.29%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for VB. At a correlation of -0.98, they often move in opposite directions. SRTY charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.
Performance
SRTY vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRTY achieves a -45.32% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SRTY has underperformed VB with an annualized return of -43.29%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.12% annualized return.
SRTY
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- 6M
- -34.59%
- YTD
- -45.32%
- 1Y
- -61.31%
- 3Y*
- -43.61%
- 5Y*
- -33.31%
- 10Y*
- -43.29%
VB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 9.68%
- YTD
- 15.87%
- 1Y
- 23.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
SRTY vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRTY ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 | -45.32% | -40.55% | -32.91% | -42.02% | 28.99% | -51.67% | -80.61% | -53.83% | 23.37% | -38.31% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.87% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRTY and VB is -0.96, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.98 |
The correlation between SRTY and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
SRTY vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRTY
VB
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SRTY
VB
Basic Materials
SRTY
-
VB
Communication Services
SRTY
-
VB
Consumer Cyclical
SRTY
-
VB
Consumer Defensive
SRTY
-
VB
Energy
SRTY
-
VB
Healthcare
SRTY
-
VB
Industrials
SRTY
-
VB
Real Estate
SRTY
-
VB
Technology
SRTY
-
VB
Utilities
SRTY
-
VB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRTY vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
SRTY
VB
SRTY vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRTY | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.25 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 2.66 | -3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 9.71 | -11.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRTY vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRTY drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than VB's maximum drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTY and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRTY | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -59.56% | -40.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.43% | -8.98% | -58.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.67% | -25.36% | -64.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.04% | -28.15% | -63.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.70% | -42.05% | -57.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -2.06% | -97.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -94.16% | -8.40% | -85.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.94% | 2.46% | +41.48% |
Volatility
SRTY vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) has a higher volatility of 11.79% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.50%. This indicates that SRTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRTY | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.79% | 3.50% | +8.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.69% | 12.06% | +30.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.23% | 16.56% | +41.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.52% | 20.75% | +46.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.25% | 21.37% | +46.88% |
SRTY vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRTY vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
SRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, more than VB's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRTY ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 | 8.40% | 6.87% | 9.40% | 4.93% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.95% | 2.13% | 0.70% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRTY and VB have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRTY has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to VB (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTY dropped -100.00% vs VB's -59.56%.
On 10-year performance, VB leads with 11.12% vs -43.29% for SRTY. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 3.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VB has performed better with a 11.12% return vs -43.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRTY.
SRTY has the higher dividend yield at 8.40%, compared with 1.21% for VB.
SRTY is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. SRTY tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while VB tracks CRSP US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRTY and 0.05% for VB.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRTY and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer