SRTY vs. ARMG
SRTY (ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SRTY is passively managed, while ARMG is actively managed. Over the past year, SRTY returned -65.58% vs 510.84% for ARMG. At a correlation of -0.53, they often move in opposite directions. SRTY charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
SRTY vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRTY achieves a -40.40% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 936.32% return.
SRTY
- 1D
- 4.15%
- 1M
- -10.54%
- YTD
- -40.40%
- 6M
- -38.33%
- 1Y
- -65.58%
- 3Y*
- -45.16%
- 5Y*
- -30.75%
- 10Y*
- -43.65%
ARMG
- 1D
- 4.85%
- 1M
- 261.28%
- YTD
- 936.32%
- 6M
- 526.62%
- 1Y
- 510.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRTY vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SRTY ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 | -40.40% | -41.48% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 936.32% | -61.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRTY and ARMG is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | -0.53 |
The correlation between SRTY and ARMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.53 to -0.46 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRTY vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
SRTY
ARMG
SRTY vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRTY | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | 3.96 | -5.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | 3.63 | -5.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.46 | -0.68 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 7.56 | -8.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.50 | 13.34 | -14.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRTY | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | 3.96 | -5.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.69 | 1.24 | -1.93 |
Drawdowns
SRTY vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRTY drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTY and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRTY | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -80.28% | -19.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.42% | -68.13% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | 0.00% | -99.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -93.78% | -53.04% | -40.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.59% | 38.55% | +5.04% |
Volatility
SRTY vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) is 17.30%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 64.57%. This indicates that SRTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRTY | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.30% | 64.57% | -47.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.81% | 103.90% | -63.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.22% | 130.31% | -73.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.43% | 138.30% | -70.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.34% | 138.30% | -69.96% |
SRTY vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRTY vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
SRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than ARMG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.47% | 4.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRTY ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 | 9.17% | 6.87% | 9.40% | 4.93% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.95% | 2.13% | 0.70% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRTY and ARMG have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARMG has higher volatility (64.57%) compared to SRTY (17.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTY dropped -100.00% vs ARMG's -80.28%.
On 1-year performance, ARMG leads with 510.84% vs -65.58% for SRTY. On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SRTY has been the lower-risk option at 17.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ARMG has performed better with a 510.84% return vs -65.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRTY.
SRTY has the higher dividend yield at 9.17%, compared with 0.47% for ARMG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRTY and 0.75% for ARMG.
ARMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRTY and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer