SRTS vs. SPMO
SRTS (Sensus Healthcare, Inc.) is a stock, while SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Over the past 5 years, SRTS returned -5.16%/yr vs 20.99%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SRTS vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRTS achieves a -24.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 22.29% return.
SRTS
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 11.25%
- 6M
- -39.21%
- YTD
- -24.25%
- 1Y
- -30.37%
- 3Y*
- -1.13%
- 5Y*
- -5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- -3.15%
- 1M
- -5.90%
- 6M
- 21.88%
- YTD
- 22.29%
- 1Y
- 29.78%
- 3Y*
- 39.07%
- 5Y*
- 20.99%
- 10Y*
- 20.30%
SRTS vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc. | -24.25% | -42.49% | 193.22% | -68.19% | 2.77% | 87.05% | 9.04% | -52.23% | 43.60% | -1.71% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 22.29% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRTS and SPMO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2016 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRTS vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
SRTS
SPMO
SRTS vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRTS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.25 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.36 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 8.15 | -9.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRTS vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRTS drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTS and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRTS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.51% | -30.95% | -56.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.39% | -12.70% | -39.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.08% | -20.13% | -49.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.51% | -22.74% | -64.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.86% | -10.13% | -69.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.98% | -4.59% | -42.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.49% | 3.67% | +30.82% |
Volatility
SRTS vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) has a higher volatility of 13.36% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 11.67%. This indicates that SRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRTS | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.36% | 11.67% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.78% | 20.23% | +29.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.53% | 22.58% | +53.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.52% | 20.33% | +61.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.30% | 20.83% | +52.47% |
Dividends
SRTS vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
SRTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.72% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRTS and SPMO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRTS has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to SPMO (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTS dropped -87.51% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRTS and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer