SRTS vs. JXI
SRTS (Sensus Healthcare, Inc.) is a stock, while JXI (iShares Global Utilities ETF) is Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Utilities Index. Over the past 5 years, SRTS returned -7.68%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for JXI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SRTS vs. JXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRTS achieves a -25.88% return, which is significantly lower than JXI's 9.92% return.
SRTS
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -25.88%
- 6M
- -22.16%
- 1Y
- -38.54%
- 3Y*
- 0.92%
- 5Y*
- -7.68%
- 10Y*
- —
JXI
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 20.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
SRTS vs. JXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc. | -25.88% | -42.49% | 193.22% | -68.19% | 2.77% | 87.05% | 9.04% | -52.23% | 43.60% | -1.71% |
JXI iShares Global Utilities ETF | 9.92% | 25.91% | 13.14% | 0.63% | -4.17% | 10.88% | 5.19% | 23.94% | 2.31% | 14.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRTS and JXI is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2016 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRTS vs. JXI — Risk / Return Rank
SRTS
JXI
SRTS vs. JXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and iShares Global Utilities ETF (JXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRTS | JXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.28 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 2.56 | -3.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 7.31 | -8.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRTS vs. JXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRTS drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than JXI's maximum drawdown of -50.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTS and JXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRTS | JXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.51% | -50.23% | -37.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.39% | -8.09% | -44.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.08% | -16.29% | -53.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.51% | -22.45% | -65.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.29% | -3.30% | -76.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.79% | -12.80% | -33.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.79% | 2.82% | +29.97% |
Volatility
SRTS vs. JXI - Volatility Comparison
Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) has a higher volatility of 16.13% compared to iShares Global Utilities ETF (JXI) at 4.37%. This indicates that SRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRTS | JXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.13% | 4.37% | +11.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.23% | 10.63% | +42.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.96% | 12.95% | +64.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.71% | 15.39% | +66.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.47% | 16.98% | +56.49% |
Dividends
SRTS vs. JXI - Dividend Comparison
SRTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JXI iShares Global Utilities ETF | 2.40% | 2.56% | 3.02% | 3.58% | 3.13% | 2.78% | 2.65% | 3.43% | 3.16% | 3.62% | 4.77% | 3.78% |
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRTS and JXI have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRTS has higher volatility (16.13%) compared to JXI (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTS dropped -87.51% vs JXI's -50.23%.
JXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRTS and JXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer