SRTS vs. CGDV
SRTS (Sensus Healthcare, Inc.) is a stock, while CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 3 years, SRTS returned 1.70%/yr vs 25.14%/yr for CGDV. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SRTS vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRTS achieves a -28.64% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.89% return.
SRTS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -28.28%
- YTD
- -28.64%
- 6M
- -29.18%
- 1Y
- -41.20%
- 3Y*
- 1.70%
- 5Y*
- -3.87%
- 10Y*
- —
CGDV
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 30.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRTS vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc. | -28.64% | -42.49% | 193.22% | -68.19% | -25.20% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 11.89% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRTS and CGDV is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRTS vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
SRTS
CGDV
SRTS vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRTS | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | 2.68 | -3.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | 3.69 | -4.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.50 | -0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 3.18 | -4.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.35 | 15.06 | -16.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRTS | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 | 2.68 | -3.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 1.24 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
SRTS vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRTS drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTS and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRTS | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.51% | -21.82% | -65.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.73% | -9.75% | -39.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.41% | -14.28% | -54.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.03% | -0.55% | -80.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.60% | -3.62% | -42.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.48% | 2.06% | +28.42% |
Volatility
SRTS vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) has a higher volatility of 33.15% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that SRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRTS | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.15% | 3.09% | +30.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.36% | 9.13% | +43.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.19% | 11.59% | +64.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.24% | 15.48% | +66.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.57% | 15.48% | +58.09% |
Dividends
SRTS vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
SRTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.17% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% |
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRTS and CGDV have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRTS has higher volatility (33.15%) compared to CGDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTS dropped -87.51% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRTS and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer