SRTS vs. CGDV
SRTS (Sensus Healthcare, Inc.) is a stock, while CGDV (Capital Group Dividend Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group. Over the past 3 years, SRTS returned -1.13%/yr vs 23.15%/yr for CGDV. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SRTS vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRTS achieves a -24.25% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 13.47% return.
SRTS
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- 11.25%
- 6M
- -39.21%
- YTD
- -24.25%
- 1Y
- -30.37%
- 3Y*
- -1.13%
- 5Y*
- -5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
CGDV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 1Y
- 22.93%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRTS vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc. | -24.25% | -42.49% | 193.22% | -68.19% | -23.19% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 13.47% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRTS and CGDV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRTS vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
SRTS
CGDV
SRTS vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRTS | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.34 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.36 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 10.96 | -11.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRTS vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRTS drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTS and CGDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRTS | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.51% | -21.82% | -65.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.39% | -9.75% | -42.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.08% | -14.28% | -55.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.86% | -0.53% | -79.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.98% | -3.54% | -43.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.49% | 2.10% | +32.39% |
Volatility
SRTS vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) has a higher volatility of 13.36% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) at 3.27%. This indicates that SRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRTS | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.36% | 3.27% | +10.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.78% | 10.07% | +39.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.53% | 12.34% | +64.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.52% | 15.51% | +66.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.30% | 15.51% | +57.79% |
Dividends
SRTS vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
SRTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.19% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% |
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRTS and CGDV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRTS has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to CGDV (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTS dropped -87.51% vs CGDV's -21.82%.
CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRTS and CGDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer