SRSA.L vs. ISAC.L
SRSA.L (iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds from iShares - SRSA.L tracks the iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) while ISAC.L tracks the MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRSA.L returned 6.41%/yr vs 12.14%/yr for ISAC.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRSA.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.
Performance
SRSA.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SRSA.L is traded in GBp, while ISAC.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISAC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRSA.L achieves a -4.79% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SRSA.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 6.41%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.
SRSA.L
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- 6M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- -4.79%
- 1Y
- 31.31%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
ISAC.L
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 10.73%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
SRSA.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRSA.L iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.79% | 65.31% | 9.25% | -5.19% | 7.61% | 5.31% | -5.99% | 5.20% | -21.09% | 24.74% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 10.73% | 13.64% | 19.87% | 16.44% | -8.43% | 19.97% | 12.26% | 20.97% | -4.37% | 13.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRSA.L and ISAC.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011 | 0.56 |
The correlation between SRSA.L and ISAC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRSA.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SRSA.L
ISAC.L
SRSA.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SRSA.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRSA.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.33 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 3.25 | -1.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 11.85 | -8.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRSA.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRSA.L drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than ISAC.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRSA.L and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRSA.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.58% | -25.84% | -26.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.06% | -6.88% | -16.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.05% | -18.33% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.76% | -18.33% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.58% | -25.84% | -26.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.04% | -2.45% | -17.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -3.51% | -13.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.60% | 1.89% | +8.71% |
Volatility
SRSA.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SRSA.L) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) at 3.31%. This indicates that SRSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRSA.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 3.31% | +3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.83% | 10.05% | +15.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.27% | 12.43% | +17.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 14.39% | +14.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.97% | 15.40% | +16.57% |
SRSA.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRSA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRSA.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SRSA.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SRSA.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISAC.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISAC.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SRSA.L.
SRSA.L tracks iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SRSA.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.
Find the right allocation for SRSA.L and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer