SRS vs. SRET
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - SRS tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%) while SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRS returned -16.94%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for SRET. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. SRS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SRET.
Performance
SRS vs. SRET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -19.64% return, which is significantly lower than SRET's 6.56% return. Over the past 10 years, SRS has underperformed SRET with an annualized return of -16.94%, while SRET has yielded a comparatively higher 1.19% annualized return.
SRS
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- -19.64%
- 6M
- -19.15%
- 1Y
- -11.91%
- 3Y*
- -15.72%
- 5Y*
- -6.69%
- 10Y*
- -16.94%
SRET
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 6.56%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 15.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 1.19%
SRS vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -19.64% | -1.45% | -3.55% | -18.78% | 54.68% | -52.22% | -33.05% | -38.97% | 6.01% | -18.03% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 6.56% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 22.77% | -5.52% | 17.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and SRET is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015 | -0.73 |
The correlation between SRS and SRET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
SRET
SRS vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRS | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.23 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 1.64 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 6.74 | -7.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRS vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than SRET's maximum drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and SRET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -66.98% | -32.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.21% | -9.48% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.58% | -18.87% | -33.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.58% | -29.43% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.12% | -66.98% | -19.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -22.17% | -77.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.23% | -22.48% | -68.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.23% | 2.30% | +7.93% |
Volatility
SRS vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) at 3.78%. This indicates that SRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 3.78% | +6.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.28% | 9.15% | +12.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.37% | 11.51% | +16.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.73% | 16.50% | +21.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.77% | 24.59% | +16.18% |
SRS vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRS vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than SRET's 7.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.91% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.92% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and SRET have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRS has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to SRET (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs SRET's -66.98%.
On 10-year performance, SRET leads with 1.19% vs -16.94% for SRS. On fees, SRET is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SRET has performed better with a 1.19% return vs -16.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRET is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.91%, compared with 3.92% for SRS.
SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.58% for SRET.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRS and SRET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer