SRS vs. SRET
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - SRS tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%) while SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRS returned -16.03%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SRET. Their -0.73 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SRS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for SRET.
Performance
SRS vs. SRET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -21.34% return, which is significantly lower than SRET's 8.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SRS has underperformed SRET with an annualized return of -16.03%, while SRET has yielded a comparatively higher 0.66% annualized return.
SRS
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- 6M
- -19.18%
- YTD
- -21.34%
- 1Y
- -18.17%
- 3Y*
- -14.70%
- 5Y*
- -5.85%
- 10Y*
- -16.03%
- ALL TIME*
- -28.33%
SRET
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 16.67%
- 3Y*
- 9.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- 0.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $622.57K | $705.15K | $786.61K | |
| $366.45K | $363.36K | $364.08K |
SRS vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -21.34% | -1.45% | -3.55% | -18.78% | 54.68% | -52.22% | -33.05% | -38.97% | 6.01% | -18.03% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 8.41% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 22.77% | -5.52% | 17.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and SRET is -0.67, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2015 | -0.73 |
The correlation between SRS and SRET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
SRET
SRS vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRS | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.25 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 1.77 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 7.27 | -8.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRS vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than SRET's maximum drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and SRET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -66.98% | -32.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.73% | -9.48% | -16.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.73% | -17.14% | -37.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.73% | -29.43% | -25.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.75% | -66.98% | -19.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -20.81% | -79.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.28% | -22.46% | -68.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.47% | 2.30% | +10.17% |
Volatility
SRS vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) at 3.57%. This indicates that SRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | SRET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.59% | 3.57% | +5.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 9.36% | +12.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.32% | 11.64% | +16.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.81% | 16.46% | +21.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.81% | 24.60% | +16.21% |
SRS vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRS vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than SRET's 7.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 7.86% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.67% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and SRET have a correlation of -0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRS has higher volatility (8.59%) compared to SRET (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs SRET's -66.98%.
On 10-year performance, SRET leads with 0.66% vs -16.03% for SRS. On fees, SRET is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SRET has performed better with a 0.66% return vs -16.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRET is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 7.86%, compared with 3.67% for SRS.
SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.58% for SRET.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRS and SRET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer