SRS vs. REIT
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and REIT (ALPS Active REIT ETF) are both REIT funds. SRS is passively managed, while REIT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRS returned -5.60%/yr vs 4.59%/yr for REIT. Their -0.93 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SRS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for REIT.
Performance
SRS vs. REIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -20.93% return, which is significantly lower than REIT's 20.23% return.
SRS
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- 6M
- -16.96%
- YTD
- -20.93%
- 1Y
- -17.75%
- 3Y*
- -12.90%
- 5Y*
- -5.60%
- 10Y*
- -15.88%
- ALL TIME*
- -28.32%
REIT
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 1Y
- 24.03%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $394.47K | $325.27K | $309.55K | |
| $359.74K | $355.42K | $364.28K |
SRS vs. REIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -20.93% | -1.45% | -3.55% | -18.78% | 54.68% | -48.02% |
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF | 20.23% | -0.55% | 7.11% | 13.74% | -21.23% | 33.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and REIT is -0.93, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021 | -0.93 |
The correlation between SRS and REIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. REIT — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
REIT
SRS vs. REIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRS | REIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.31 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 3.23 | -3.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 10.12 | -11.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRS vs. REIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than REIT's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and REIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | REIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -29.30% | -70.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.73% | -7.35% | -18.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.73% | -18.19% | -36.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.73% | -29.30% | -25.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -2.31% | -97.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.28% | -10.09% | -81.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.39% | 2.34% | +10.05% |
Volatility
SRS vs. REIT - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) at 4.58%. This indicates that SRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | REIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 4.58% | +4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 10.45% | +11.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.47% | 13.41% | +15.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.79% | 18.51% | +19.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.81% | 18.32% | +22.49% |
SRS vs. REIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than REIT's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRS vs. REIT - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than REIT's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REIT ALPS Active REIT ETF | 2.65% | 3.20% | 3.06% | 3.13% | 2.81% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.65% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and REIT have a correlation of -0.93, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRS has higher volatility (8.83%) compared to REIT (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs REIT's -29.30%.
On 5-year performance, REIT leads with 4.59% vs -5.60% for SRS. On fees, REIT is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, REIT has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, REIT has performed better with a 4.59% return vs -5.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REIT is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.
SRS has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 2.65% for REIT.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and ALPS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.68% for REIT.
REIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRS and REIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer