SRS vs. IVRA
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRS is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco. SRS is passively managed, while IVRA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRS returned -5.84%/yr vs 7.62%/yr for IVRA. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. SRS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IVRA.
Performance
SRS vs. IVRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -14.05% return, which is significantly lower than IVRA's 11.70% return.
SRS
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- -14.05%
- 6M
- -12.14%
- 1Y
- -9.76%
- 3Y*
- -12.75%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- -16.52%
IVRA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
SRS vs. IVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -14.05% | -1.45% | -3.55% | -18.78% | 54.68% | -52.22% | -3.28% |
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 11.70% | 10.20% | 13.07% | 9.13% | -10.00% | 32.74% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and IVRA is -0.66, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020 | -0.83 |
The correlation between SRS and IVRA shifts across timeframes, from -0.84 (5 years) to -0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SRS vs. IVRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRS
IVRA
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SRS
IVRA
Basic Materials
SRS
-
IVRA
Communication Services
SRS
-
IVRA
-
Consumer Cyclical
SRS
-
IVRA
Consumer Defensive
SRS
-
IVRA
Energy
SRS
-
IVRA
Healthcare
SRS
-
IVRA
-
Industrials
SRS
-
IVRA
-
Real Estate
SRS
-
IVRA
Technology
SRS
-
IVRA
-
Utilities
SRS
-
IVRA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. IVRA — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
IVRA
SRS vs. IVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRS | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.36 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 3.46 | -3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 12.02 | -13.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRS | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | 1.72 | -2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.46 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | 0.73 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
SRS vs. IVRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than IVRA's maximum drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and IVRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -25.99% | -73.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.53% | -4.60% | -15.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.56% | -15.03% | -36.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.56% | -25.99% | -25.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -0.92% | -99.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.23% | -7.27% | -83.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 1.32% | +7.76% |
Volatility
SRS vs. IVRA - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) at 0.00%. This indicates that SRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 0.00% | +7.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 5.45% | +13.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.06% | 9.27% | +17.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.58% | 16.58% | +21.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.67% | 16.39% | +24.28% |
SRS vs. IVRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IVRA's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRS vs. IVRA - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than IVRA's 16.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.99% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.67% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and IVRA have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRS has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to IVRA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs IVRA's -25.99%.
On 5-year performance, IVRA leads with 7.62% vs -5.84% for SRS. On fees, IVRA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, IVRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVRA has performed better with a 7.62% return vs -5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVRA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.99%, compared with 3.67% for SRS.
SRS is categorized as REIT, while IVRA is ESG. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRS and IVRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer