SRRK vs. OMER
SRRK (Scholar Rock Holding Corporation) and OMER (Omeros Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Biotechnology industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 5 years, SRRK returned 8.97%/yr vs -9.29%/yr for OMER. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SRRK vs. OMER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRRK achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly higher than OMER's -42.65% return.
SRRK
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -9.49%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- 27.96%
- 3Y*
- 84.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- —
OMER
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -30.29%
- YTD
- -42.65%
- 6M
- -13.60%
- 1Y
- 161.27%
- 3Y*
- 9.51%
- 5Y*
- -9.29%
- 10Y*
- -0.87%
SRRK vs. OMER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRRK Scholar Rock Holding Corporation | -0.57% | 1.92% | 129.89% | 107.73% | -63.57% | -48.82% | 268.21% | -42.62% | 48.19% |
OMER Omeros Corporation | -42.65% | 73.84% | 202.14% | 44.69% | -64.85% | -54.99% | 1.38% | 26.48% | -43.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRRK and OMER is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2018 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
SRRK:
$5.57B
OMER:
$625.58M
SRRK:
-$3.49
OMER:
-$0.05
SRRK:
$0.00
OMER:
$0.00
SRRK:
-$1.27M
OMER:
-$10.29M
SRRK:
-$394.71M
OMER:
-$110.44M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRRK vs. OMER — Risk / Return Rank
SRRK
OMER
SRRK vs. OMER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Scholar Rock Holding Corporation (SRRK) and Omeros Corporation (OMER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRRK | OMER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.47 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 3.77 | -2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 7.05 | -5.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRRK | OMER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 0.87 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | -0.07 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.01 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SRRK vs. OMER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRRK drawdown since its inception was -93.15%, roughly equal to the maximum OMER drawdown of -95.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRRK and OMER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRRK | OMER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.15% | -95.95% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.86% | -43.00% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.21% | -85.60% | +20.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.96% | -93.37% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -95.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.61% | -63.09% | +27.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.44% | -48.45% | -7.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.61% | 22.99% | -8.38% |
Volatility
SRRK vs. OMER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Scholar Rock Holding Corporation (SRRK) is 13.58%, while Omeros Corporation (OMER) has a volatility of 15.62%. This indicates that SRRK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRRK | OMER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.58% | 15.62% | -2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.86% | 72.52% | -36.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.55% | 186.97% | -121.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 180.23% | 134.66% | +45.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 157.72% | 110.86% | +46.86% |
Dividends
SRRK vs. OMER - Dividend Comparison
Neither SRRK nor OMER has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SRRK vs. OMER - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Scholar Rock Holding Corporation and Omeros Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SRRK and OMER have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OMER has higher volatility (15.62%) compared to SRRK (13.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRRK dropped -93.15% vs OMER's -95.95%.
OMER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRRK and OMER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer