SRPT vs. VTV
SRPT (Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.) is a stock, while VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Over the past 10 years, SRPT returned -4.91%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for VTV. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SRPT vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRPT achieves a -25.98% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 18.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SRPT has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of -4.91%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.
SRPT
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- -16.94%
- 6M
- -19.26%
- YTD
- -25.98%
- 1Y
- -4.90%
- 3Y*
- -46.72%
- 5Y*
- -27.55%
- 10Y*
- -4.91%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.33%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 18.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $48.42M | $52.85M | $57.85M | |
| $671.07M | $667.81M | $625.90M |
SRPT vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | -25.98% | -82.30% | 26.09% | -25.58% | 43.90% | -47.18% | 32.12% | 18.24% | 96.14% | 102.84% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 18.51% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRPT and VTV is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRPT vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
SRPT
VTV
SRPT vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRPT | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.51 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 4.59 | -4.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 17.77 | -18.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRPT vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRPT drawdown since its inception was -98.17%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRPT and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRPT | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.17% | -59.27% | -38.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.22% | -6.35% | -32.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.72% | -14.52% | -78.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.72% | -17.04% | -75.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.33% | -36.78% | -56.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.09% | 0.00% | -91.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -7.81% | -60.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.55% | 1.64% | +19.91% |
Volatility
SRPT vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) has a higher volatility of 14.49% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.83%. This indicates that SRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRPT | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.49% | 2.83% | +11.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.61% | 7.77% | +43.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 80.76% | 10.30% | +70.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.76% | 13.82% | +55.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.28% | 16.62% | +53.66% |
Dividends
SRPT vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
SRPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRPT and VTV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRPT has higher volatility (14.49%) compared to VTV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRPT dropped -98.17% vs VTV's -59.27%.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRPT and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer