SRPT vs. WULF

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

SRPT (Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.) and WULF (TeraWulf Inc.) are both stocks. SRPT operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while WULF operates in Information Technology Services (Technology). Over the past 3 years, SRPT returned -48.30%/yr vs 85.20%/yr for WULF. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

SRPT vs. WULF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRPT achieves a -30.95% return, which is significantly lower than WULF's 53.70% return.

SRPT

• 1D: -4.50%
• 1M: -22.93%
• 6M: -26.94%
• YTD: -30.95%
• 1Y: -6.60%
• 3Y*: -48.30%
• 5Y*: -26.18%
• 10Y*: -5.26%
• ALL TIME*: -3.56%

WULF

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -16.62%
• 6M: 32.09%
• YTD: 53.70%
• 1Y: 271.01%
• 3Y*: 85.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -11.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.	$46.66M	$54.69M	$59.65M
WULF TeraWulf Inc.	$594.29M	$753.10M	$725.98M

SRPT vs. WULF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.	-30.95%	-82.30%	26.09%	-25.58%	43.90%	6.43%
WULF TeraWulf Inc.	53.70%	103.00%	135.83%	260.58%	-95.58%	-52.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SRPT and WULF is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021	0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap SRPT : $1.57B WULF : $8.75B
EPS SRPT : $0.60 WULF : -$2.52
PS Ratio SRPT : 0.74 WULF : 42.81
Total Revenue (TTM) SRPT : $2.18B WULF : $168.06M
Gross Profit (TTM) SRPT : $751.34M WULF : $107.59M
EBITDA (TTM) SRPT : $107.91M WULF : -$132.10M

Return for Risk

SRPT vs. WULF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SRPT

SRPT Risk / Return Rank: 40
SRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
SRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
SRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 36

WULF

WULF Risk / Return Rank: 94
WULF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
WULF Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
WULF Omega Ratio Rank: 90
WULF Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
WULF Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SRPT vs. WULF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) and TeraWulf Inc. (WULF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SRPT	WULF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	2.26	-2.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	3.08	-2.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.36	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	5.09	-5.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.45	16.02	-16.47

SRPT vs. WULF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the WULF Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRPT and WULF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SRPT vs. WULF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRPT drawdown since its inception was -98.17%, roughly equal to the maximum WULF drawdown of -98.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRPT and WULF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRPT	WULF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.17%	-98.30%	+0.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.22%	-47.93%	+8.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-92.72%	-74.60%	-18.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.69%	-44.45%	-47.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.27%	-80.45%	+12.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.23%	15.21%	+6.02%

Volatility

SRPT vs. WULF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) is 13.90%, while TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) has a volatility of 33.74%. This indicates that SRPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WULF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRPT	WULF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.90%	33.74%	-19.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.20%	67.95%	-16.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.79%	107.86%	-27.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.03%	127.23%	-57.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.26%	127.23%	-56.97%

Dividends

SRPT vs. WULF - Dividend Comparison

Neither SRPT nor WULF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SRPT Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WULF TeraWulf Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	33.22%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRPT and WULF in my portfolio?

SRPT and WULF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRPT or WULF?

WULF has higher volatility (33.74%) compared to SRPT (13.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRPT dropped -98.17% vs WULF's -98.30%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WULF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.