SROI vs. KLMT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SROI (Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF) and KLMT (Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. SROI is actively managed, while KLMT is passively managed. Over the past year, SROI returned 20.43% vs 27.90% for KLMT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SROI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for KLMT.

Performance

SROI vs. KLMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly lower than KLMT's 12.41% return.

SROI

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 3.21%
• YTD: 11.41%
• 6M: 11.69%
• 1Y: 20.43%
• 3Y*: 14.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KLMT

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 4.70%
• YTD: 12.41%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 27.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SROI vs. KLMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	11.41%	16.36%	0.51%
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	12.41%	21.31%	4.94%

Correlation

The correlation between SROI and KLMT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024	0.95

The correlation between SROI and KLMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SROI vs. KLMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SROI	KLMT
Technology	29.6%	30.0%
Industrials	18.1%	10.2%
Financial Services	13.6%	16.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	9.2%
Healthcare	8.8%	8.0%
Communication Services	7.4%	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	4.6%
Basic Materials	4.4%	2.8%
Utilities	2.5%	2.0%
Real Estate	1.0%	2.7%
Energy	0.8%	4.1%

Return for Risk

SROI vs. KLMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SROI

SROI Risk / Return Rank: 45
SROI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
SROI Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SROI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SROI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
SROI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

KLMT

KLMT Risk / Return Rank: 67
KLMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
KLMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
KLMT Omega Ratio Rank: 68
KLMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
KLMT Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SROI vs. KLMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SROI	KLMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	2.22	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	3.10	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.40	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	2.94	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.67	12.77	-4.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SROI vs. KLMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SROI Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the KLMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SROI and KLMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SROI	KLMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.53	2.22	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	1.29	-0.27

Drawdowns

SROI vs. KLMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, smaller than the maximum KLMT drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and KLMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SROI	KLMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-16.87%	+1.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-9.54%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-0.45%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-1.91%	-0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.36%	2.19%	+0.17%

Volatility

SROI vs. KLMT - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) at 3.71%. This indicates that SROI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KLMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SROI	KLMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	3.71%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	10.07%	+0.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.38%	12.61%	+0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.86%	15.83%	-1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.86%	15.83%	-1.97%

SROI vs. KLMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KLMT's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

SROI vs. KLMT - Dividend Comparison

SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than KLMT's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
KLMT Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF	1.74%	1.95%	0.85%	0.00%
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	0.54%	0.60%	0.68%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SROI and KLMT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SROI and KLMT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SROI or KLMT?

SROI has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to KLMT (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SROI dropped -15.38% vs KLMT's -16.87%.

Which ETF is better, SROI or KLMT?

On 1-year performance, KLMT leads with 27.90% vs 20.43% for SROI. On fees, KLMT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, KLMT has been the lower-risk option at 3.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SROI or KLMT?

Over the 1-year period, KLMT has performed better with a 27.90% return vs 20.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SROI or KLMT?

KLMT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SROI or KLMT?

KLMT has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.54% for SROI.

What is the main difference between SROI and KLMT?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SROI and 0.10% for KLMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KLMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.