PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SROI vs. CPSU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SROI vs. CPSU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than CPSU's 2.29% return.


SROI

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.89%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.15%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
14.52%
5Y*
10Y*

CPSU

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.84%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SROI vs. CPSU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SROI and CPSU is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.75

The correlation between SROI and CPSU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SROI vs. CPSU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SROI
SROI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SROI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SROI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SROI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SROI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SROI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

CPSU
CPSU Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CPSU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPSU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPSU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CPSU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPSU Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SROI vs. CPSU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SROICPSUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.97

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

6.29

-4.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

42.62

-33.85

SROI vs. CPSU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SROI Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the CPSU Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SROI and CPSU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SROICPSUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

3.76

-2.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

3.81

-2.79

Drawdowns

SROI vs. CPSU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, which is greater than CPSU's maximum drawdown of -1.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and CPSU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SROICPSUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-1.03%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.19%

-1.03%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.15%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-0.07%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

0.15%

+2.21%

Volatility

SROI vs. CPSU - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June (CPSU) at 0.29%. This indicates that SROI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPSU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SROICPSUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

0.29%

+3.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.86%

1.39%

+9.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

1.72%

+11.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.87%

1.72%

+12.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.87%

1.72%

+12.15%

SROI vs. CPSU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CPSU's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

SROI vs. CPSU - Dividend Comparison

SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, while CPSU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CPSU
Calamos S&P 500 Structured Alt Protection ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SROI
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF
0.54%0.60%0.68%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


SROI and CPSU have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SROI has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to CPSU (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SROI dropped -15.38% vs CPSU's -1.03%.

On 1-year performance, SROI leads with 20.66% vs 6.43% for CPSU. On fees, CPSU is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CPSU has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SROI has performed better with a 20.66% return vs 6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CPSU is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.

SROI has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.00% for CPSU.

SROI is categorized as Global Equities, while CPSU is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SROI and 0.69% for CPSU.

CPSU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SROI and CPSU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer