SROI vs. CBXA

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SROI (Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF) and CBXA (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - SROI is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Calamos, while CBXA is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index. SROI is actively managed, while CBXA is passively managed. Over the past year, SROI returned 16.93% vs -25.64% for CBXA. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SROI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXA.

Performance

SROI vs. CBXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly higher than CBXA's -20.34% return.

SROI

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: 7.63%
• YTD: 10.44%
• 1Y: 16.93%
• 3Y*: 12.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBXA

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -0.43%
• 6M: -24.61%
• YTD: -20.34%
• 1Y: -25.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SROI vs. CBXA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	10.44%	26.53%
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	-20.34%	9.67%

Correlation

The correlation between SROI and CBXA is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

SROI vs. CBXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SROI

SROI Risk / Return Rank: 42
SROI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
SROI Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SROI Omega Ratio Rank: 39
SROI Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
SROI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

CBXA

CBXA Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBXA Omega Ratio Rank: 0
CBXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBXA Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SROI vs. CBXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SROI	CBXA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	-1.42	+2.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	-1.97	+3.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.76	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	-0.87	+2.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	-1.51	+8.47

SROI vs. CBXA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SROI Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the CBXA Sharpe Ratio of -1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SROI and CBXA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SROI vs. CBXA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, smaller than the maximum CBXA drawdown of -29.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and CBXA.

Drawdown Indicators

	SROI	CBXA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-29.68%	+14.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-29.68%	+19.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-27.48%	+26.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.39%	-10.42%	+8.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	17.01%	-14.57%

Volatility

SROI vs. CBXA - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBXA) at 3.49%. This indicates that SROI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBXA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SROI	CBXA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	3.49%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.08%	14.47%	-2.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.29%	18.19%	-3.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.01%	16.79%	-2.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.01%	16.79%	-2.78%

SROI vs. CBXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

SROI vs. CBXA - Dividend Comparison

SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than CBXA's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CBXA Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	2.48%	1.97%	0.00%	0.00%
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	0.54%	0.60%	0.68%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SROI and CBXA in my portfolio?

SROI and CBXA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SROI or CBXA?

SROI has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to CBXA (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SROI dropped -15.38% vs CBXA's -29.68%.

Which ETF is better, SROI or CBXA?

On 1-year performance, SROI leads with 16.93% vs -25.64% for CBXA. On fees, CBXA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBXA has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SROI or CBXA?

Over the 1-year period, SROI has performed better with a 16.93% return vs -25.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SROI or CBXA?

CBXA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SROI or CBXA?

CBXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.54% for SROI.

What is the main difference between SROI and CBXA?

SROI is categorized as Global Equities, while CBXA is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SROI and 0.69% for CBXA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SROI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.