SROI vs. CBTJ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SROI (Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF) and CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - SROI is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Calamos, while CBTJ is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SROI returned 17.32% vs -34.58% for CBTJ. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SROI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBTJ.

Performance

SROI vs. CBTJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly higher than CBTJ's -20.32% return.

SROI

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 9.10%
• 6M: 8.56%
• 1Y: 17.32%
• 3Y*: 13.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBTJ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -11.63%
• YTD: -20.32%
• 6M: -20.85%
• 1Y: -34.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SROI vs. CBTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	9.10%	14.55%
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-20.32%	-11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between SROI and CBTJ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

SROI vs. CBTJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SROI

SROI Risk / Return Rank: 39
SROI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
SROI Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
SROI Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SROI Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
SROI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

CBTJ

CBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SROI vs. CBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SROI	CBTJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	-1.29	+2.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	-1.89	+3.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.79	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	-0.83	+2.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.17	-1.35	+8.52

SROI vs. CBTJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SROI Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the CBTJ Sharpe Ratio of -1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SROI and CBTJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SROI vs. CBTJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, smaller than the maximum CBTJ drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and CBTJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SROI	CBTJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-41.84%	+26.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.19%	-41.84%	+31.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.46%	-41.84%	+39.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.41%	-16.18%	+13.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	25.59%	-23.17%

Volatility

SROI vs. CBTJ - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) have volatilities of 5.40% and 5.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SROI	CBTJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	5.25%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	18.07%	-6.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.07%	27.00%	-12.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.03%	25.31%	-11.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.03%	25.31%	-11.28%

SROI vs. CBTJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBTJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

SROI vs. CBTJ - Dividend Comparison

SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than CBTJ's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	1.82%	1.45%	0.00%	0.00%
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF	0.55%	0.60%	0.68%	0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SROI and CBTJ in my portfolio?

SROI and CBTJ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SROI or CBTJ?

SROI has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to CBTJ (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SROI dropped -15.38% vs CBTJ's -41.84%.

Which ETF is better, SROI or CBTJ?

On 1-year performance, SROI leads with 17.32% vs -34.58% for CBTJ. On fees, CBTJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBTJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SROI or CBTJ?

Over the 1-year period, SROI has performed better with a 17.32% return vs -34.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SROI or CBTJ?

CBTJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SROI or CBTJ?

CBTJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 0.55% for SROI.

What is the main difference between SROI and CBTJ?

SROI is categorized as Global Equities, while CBTJ is Blockchain. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SROI and 0.69% for CBTJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SROI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.