PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRLN vs. HYHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRLN vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SRLN has underperformed HYHG with an annualized return of 4.52%, while HYHG has yielded a comparatively higher 6.12% annualized return.


SRLN

1D
0.05%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.73%
6M
1.31%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
4.63%
10Y*
4.52%

HYHG

1D
0.12%
1M
0.64%
YTD
3.03%
6M
3.57%
1Y
7.52%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
6.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRLN vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRLN
SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
0.73%6.77%8.43%11.62%-5.30%4.49%3.13%10.03%-0.66%3.39%
HYHG
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged
3.03%5.31%11.41%14.69%-1.71%5.75%0.16%12.02%-1.95%3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between SRLN and HYHG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2013

0.38

The correlation between SRLN and HYHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SRLN vs. HYHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRLN
HYHG

Communication Services

91.8%
1.1%

Industrials

8.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

SRLN
91.8%
HYHG
1.1%

Industrials

SRLN
8.2%
HYHG

-

Basic Materials

SRLN

-

HYHG

-

Consumer Cyclical

SRLN

-

HYHG

-

Consumer Defensive

SRLN

-

HYHG

-

Energy

SRLN

-

HYHG

-

Financial Services

SRLN

-

HYHG

-

Healthcare

SRLN

-

HYHG
0.6%

Real Estate

SRLN

-

HYHG

-

Technology

SRLN

-

HYHG

-

Utilities

SRLN

-

HYHG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRLN vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRLN
SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HYHG
HYHG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HYHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HYHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYHG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRLN vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRLNHYHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

3.74

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.41

12.28

-5.87

SRLN vs. HYHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the HYHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRLN and HYHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRLNHYHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

1.36

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

0.86

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.67

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.46

+0.24

Drawdowns

SRLN vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and HYHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRLNHYHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-25.71%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-2.02%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-7.47%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.93%

-9.21%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

-25.71%

+3.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.32%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-3.04%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.61%

+0.27%

Volatility

SRLN vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) is 0.44%, while ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that SRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRLNHYHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

1.42%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

4.30%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

5.56%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.91%

8.16%

-4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

9.15%

-3.09%

SRLN vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRLN vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison

SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than HYHG's 6.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYHG
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged
6.78%6.97%6.57%6.07%5.58%4.54%5.21%6.06%6.45%5.57%5.37%6.37%
SRLN
SPDR Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
7.49%7.67%8.58%8.44%5.72%4.45%4.91%5.39%4.98%4.01%3.94%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRLN and HYHG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYHG has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to SRLN (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRLN dropped -22.29% vs HYHG's -25.71%.

On 10-year performance, HYHG leads with 6.12% vs 4.52% for SRLN. On fees, HYHG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYHG has performed better with a 6.12% return vs 4.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYHG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.

SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.49%, compared with 6.78% for HYHG.

SRLN tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Leveraged Loan Index, while HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SRLN and 0.50% for HYHG.

SRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRLN and HYHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer