PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRHQX vs. GPICX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRHQX vs. GPICX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRHQX achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than GPICX's 1.10% return.


SRHQX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.74%
6M
1.06%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*
2.19%

GPICX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3.32%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRHQX vs. GPICX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SRHQX
Principal Short-Term Income Fund
0.74%5.31%4.91%5.20%-4.19%-1.02%3.87%4.38%1.14%
GPICX
GuidepathConservative Income Fund
1.10%3.49%4.73%4.87%-1.67%0.08%-0.23%2.30%0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SRHQX and GPICX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2018

0.37

The correlation between SRHQX and GPICX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRHQX vs. GPICX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRHQX
SRHQX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SRHQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRHQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRHQX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SRHQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRHQX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

GPICX
GPICX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
GPICX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPICX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPICX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
GPICX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPICX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRHQX vs. GPICX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX) and GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRHQXGPICXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

3.02

-1.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

13.45

-10.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

69.81

-56.70

SRHQX vs. GPICX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRHQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the GPICX Sharpe Ratio of 4.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRHQX and GPICX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRHQX vs. GPICX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRHQX drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, which is greater than GPICX's maximum drawdown of -3.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRHQX and GPICX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRHQXGPICXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-3.10%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.06%

-0.25%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.06%

-0.52%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.92%

-2.79%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

0.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-0.56%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.05%

+0.23%

Volatility

SRHQX vs. GPICX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Short-Term Income Fund (SRHQX) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to GuidepathConservative Income Fund (GPICX) at 0.19%. This indicates that SRHQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPICX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRHQXGPICXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.19%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.27%

0.61%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76%

0.79%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.11%

1.10%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.85%

1.06%

+0.79%

SRHQX vs. GPICX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRHQX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GPICX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRHQX vs. GPICX - Dividend Comparison

SRHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than GPICX's 3.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPICX
GuidepathConservative Income Fund
3.80%3.86%4.53%4.23%1.51%0.48%0.57%1.67%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRHQX
Principal Short-Term Income Fund
3.75%3.66%3.51%2.38%1.38%1.33%2.17%2.05%2.07%1.71%1.65%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRHQX and GPICX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRHQX has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to GPICX (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRHQX dropped -7.95% vs GPICX's -3.10%.

GPICX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.20 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRHQX and GPICX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer