SRET vs. URE
SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) and URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) are both REIT funds - SRET tracks the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index while URE tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRET returned 1.05%/yr vs 2.80%/yr for URE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRET charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for URE.
Performance
SRET vs. URE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRET achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 13.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SRET has underperformed URE with an annualized return of 1.05%, while URE has yielded a comparatively higher 2.80% annualized return.
SRET
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
URE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- -4.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
SRET vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 3.74% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 22.77% | -5.52% | 17.80% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 13.97% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 11.58% | -49.64% | 88.24% | -28.06% | 57.86% | -13.80% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRET and URE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2015 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SRET and URE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SRET vs. URE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRET
URE
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
SRET
URE
Financial Services
SRET
URE
Basic Materials
SRET
-
URE
Communication Services
SRET
-
URE
-
Consumer Cyclical
SRET
-
URE
-
Consumer Defensive
SRET
-
URE
-
Energy
SRET
-
URE
-
Healthcare
SRET
-
URE
-
Industrials
SRET
-
URE
-
Technology
SRET
-
URE
-
Utilities
SRET
-
URE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRET vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank
SRET
URE
SRET vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRET | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.07 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.50 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 1.20 | +5.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRET | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.31 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | -0.11 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.07 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | -0.06 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
SRET vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRET drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRET and URE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRET | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.98% | -97.16% | +30.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -16.50% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.87% | -33.77% | +14.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.56% | -63.66% | +33.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.98% | -70.49% | +3.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.23% | -52.68% | +28.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.49% | -64.52% | +42.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 6.83% | -4.56% |
Volatility
SRET vs. URE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is 3.11%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that SRET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRET | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 7.56% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 19.29% | -10.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 26.73% | -15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 37.28% | -20.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 40.53% | -15.95% |
SRET vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRET has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than URE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRET vs. URE - Dividend Comparison
SRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, more than URE's 2.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 8.78% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 2.05% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRET and URE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URE has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to SRET (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRET dropped -66.98% vs URE's -97.16%.
On 10-year performance, URE leads with 2.80% vs 1.05% for SRET. On fees, SRET is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, URE has performed better with a 2.80% return vs 1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRET is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 8.78%, compared with 2.05% for URE.
SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SRET and 0.95% for URE.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRET and URE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer