PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRET vs. URE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRET vs. URE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRET achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 13.97% return. Over the past 10 years, SRET has underperformed URE with an annualized return of 1.05%, while URE has yielded a comparatively higher 2.80% annualized return.


SRET

1D
-1.07%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
3.74%
6M
4.08%
1Y
14.94%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*
1.05%

URE

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
13.97%
6M
11.99%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
8.96%
5Y*
-4.07%
10Y*
2.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRET vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
3.74%18.09%-1.55%9.85%-18.24%14.00%-36.63%22.77%-5.52%17.80%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
13.97%-3.65%0.35%11.58%-49.64%88.24%-28.06%57.86%-13.80%16.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SRET and URE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2015

0.74

The correlation between SRET and URE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

SRET vs. URE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SRET
URE

Real Estate

92.5%
67.2%

Financial Services

3.1%
8.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

SRET
92.5%
URE
67.2%

Financial Services

SRET
3.1%
URE
8.6%

Basic Materials

SRET

-

URE
1.2%

Communication Services

SRET

-

URE

-

Consumer Cyclical

SRET

-

URE

-

Consumer Defensive

SRET

-

URE

-

Energy

SRET

-

URE

-

Healthcare

SRET

-

URE

-

Industrials

SRET

-

URE

-

Technology

SRET

-

URE

-

Utilities

SRET

-

URE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRET vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRET
SRET Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SRET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRET Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRET Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SRET Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRET Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

URE
URE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRET vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRETUREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.07

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

0.50

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

1.20

+5.41

SRET vs. URE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRET Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the URE Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRET and URE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRETUREDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.31

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

-0.11

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.07

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

-0.06

+0.12

Drawdowns

SRET vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRET drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRET and URE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRETUREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.98%

-97.16%

+30.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-16.50%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.87%

-33.77%

+14.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.56%

-63.66%

+33.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.98%

-70.49%

+3.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.23%

-52.68%

+28.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.49%

-64.52%

+42.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

6.83%

-4.56%

Volatility

SRET vs. URE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) is 3.11%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that SRET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRETUREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

7.56%

-4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

19.29%

-10.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.36%

26.73%

-15.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

37.28%

-20.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

40.53%

-15.95%

SRET vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRET has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than URE's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRET vs. URE - Dividend Comparison

SRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, more than URE's 2.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SRET
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF
8.78%7.98%8.72%7.21%8.30%6.33%8.88%7.83%8.54%8.20%8.08%7.74%
URE
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
2.05%2.42%2.09%1.32%1.26%0.58%0.94%1.10%1.53%0.93%0.96%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRET and URE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URE has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to SRET (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRET dropped -66.98% vs URE's -97.16%.

On 10-year performance, URE leads with 2.80% vs 1.05% for SRET. On fees, SRET is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, SRET has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, URE has performed better with a 2.80% return vs 1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRET is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.

SRET has the higher dividend yield at 8.78%, compared with 2.05% for URE.

SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SRET and 0.95% for URE.

SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRET and URE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer