SRET vs. PFFR
SRET (Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF) and PFFR (InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRET is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while PFFR is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRET returned 1.19%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for PFFR. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRET charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PFFR.
Performance
SRET vs. PFFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRET achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly higher than PFFR's 0.80% return.
SRET
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -1.81%
- YTD
- 3.74%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 14.94%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
PFFR
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 6.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- —
SRET vs. PFFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 3.74% | 18.09% | -1.55% | 9.85% | -18.24% | 14.00% | -36.63% | 22.77% | -5.52% | 14.18% |
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 0.80% | 5.36% | 7.12% | 21.04% | -23.90% | 6.76% | 0.19% | 20.28% | -7.45% | 7.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRET and PFFR is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017 | 0.41 |
SRET vs. PFFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRET
PFFR
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
SRET
PFFR
Financial Services
SRET
PFFR
Basic Materials
SRET
-
PFFR
-
Communication Services
SRET
-
PFFR
-
Consumer Cyclical
SRET
-
PFFR
-
Consumer Defensive
SRET
-
PFFR
-
Energy
SRET
-
PFFR
-
Healthcare
SRET
-
PFFR
-
Industrials
SRET
-
PFFR
-
Technology
SRET
-
PFFR
-
Utilities
SRET
-
PFFR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRET vs. PFFR — Risk / Return Rank
SRET
PFFR
SRET vs. PFFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) and InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRET | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.16 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.04 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.61 | 2.44 | +4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRET | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.87 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.09 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.16 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
SRET vs. PFFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRET drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than PFFR's maximum drawdown of -53.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRET and PFFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRET | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.98% | -53.02% | -13.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.48% | -6.57% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.87% | -11.16% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.56% | -29.80% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.23% | -3.05% | -21.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.49% | -7.00% | -15.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.80% | -0.53% |
Volatility
SRET vs. PFFR - Volatility Comparison
Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF (PFFR) at 2.81%. This indicates that SRET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRET | PFFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 2.81% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | 6.14% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 7.91% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 10.47% | +6.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.58% | 20.54% | +4.04% |
SRET vs. PFFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRET has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFR's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRET vs. PFFR - Dividend Comparison
SRET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, more than PFFR's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFR InfraCap REIT Preferred ETF | 8.29% | 7.99% | 7.78% | 7.72% | 8.60% | 6.08% | 6.11% | 5.77% | 6.48% | 6.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF | 8.78% | 7.98% | 8.72% | 7.21% | 8.30% | 6.33% | 8.88% | 7.83% | 8.54% | 8.20% | 8.08% | 7.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRET and PFFR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRET has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to PFFR (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRET dropped -66.98% vs PFFR's -53.02%.
On 5-year performance, SRET leads with 1.19% vs 0.97% for PFFR. On fees, PFFR is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PFFR has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SRET has performed better with a 1.19% return vs 0.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFR is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SRET.
SRET has the higher dividend yield at 8.78%, compared with 8.29% for PFFR.
SRET is categorized as REIT, while PFFR is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. SRET tracks Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index, while PFFR tracks Indxx REIT Preferred Stock Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SRET and 0.45% for PFFR.
SRET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRET and PFFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer