SQMX vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SQMX (FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Max Buffer ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQMX is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. SQMX is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. SQMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

SQMX vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Max Buffer ETF (SQMX) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SQMX

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 6M: 2.98%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SQMX vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SQMX FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Max Buffer ETF	0.12%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	3.22%

Correlation

The correlation between SQMX and BPH is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	-0.64

Return for Risk

SQMX vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SQMX

SQMX Risk / Return Rank: 85
SQMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SQMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SQMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SQMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SQMX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SQMX vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly Max Buffer ETF (SQMX) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SQMX	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.93	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SQMX	BPH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	9.79	-8.63

Drawdowns

SQMX vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SQMX drawdown since its inception was -7.40%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQMX and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	SQMX	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.40%	-2.35%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.55%	-0.93%	+0.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SQMX	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.72%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36%	23.51%	-20.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.27%	23.51%	-17.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.27%	23.51%	-17.24%

SQMX vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SQMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SQMX vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

Neither SQMX nor BPH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SQMX and BPH in my portfolio?

SQMX and BPH have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SQMX or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SQMX or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SQMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SQMX or BPH?

SQMX and BPH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between SQMX and BPH?

SQMX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for SQMX and 0.19% for BPH.