PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYX vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYX vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a 7.48% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 6.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYX has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 15.61%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.


SPYX

1D
-1.36%
1M
-1.24%
YTD
7.48%
6M
6.47%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
15.61%

XLU

1D
0.78%
1M
0.02%
YTD
6.99%
6M
7.17%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYX vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
7.48%17.87%25.46%26.38%-19.59%28.06%19.87%31.62%-4.26%23.25%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
6.99%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYX and XLU is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2015

0.35

The correlation between SPYX and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPYX vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYX
XLU

Technology

39.7%

-

Financial Services

11.4%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Industrials

7.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Utilities

2.2%
100.0%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Energy

1.1%

-

Technology

SPYX
39.7%
XLU

-

Financial Services

SPYX
11.4%
XLU

-

Communication Services

SPYX
10.9%
XLU

-

Consumer Cyclical

SPYX
10.1%
XLU

-

Healthcare

SPYX
8.5%
XLU

-

Industrials

SPYX
7.9%
XLU

-

Consumer Defensive

SPYX
4.6%
XLU

-

Utilities

SPYX
2.2%
XLU
100.0%

Real Estate

SPYX
1.9%
XLU

-

Basic Materials

SPYX
1.7%
XLU

-

Energy

SPYX
1.1%
XLU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYX vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYX
SPYX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYX vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYXXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.17

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.54

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.49

3.26

+7.23

SPYX vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYX and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYX vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYXXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.84%

-51.98%

+19.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-9.18%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-17.26%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-25.26%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.84%

-36.07%

+3.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.08%

-4.30%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-10.21%

+5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

4.32%

-2.12%

Volatility

SPYX vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) have volatilities of 4.98% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYXXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

5.21%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

11.70%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.82%

14.69%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.15%

17.30%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

19.29%

-1.26%

SPYX vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPYX vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than XLU's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
0.88%0.91%1.05%1.21%1.41%1.04%1.33%1.56%1.92%1.68%1.91%0.16%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.65%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYX and XLU have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to SPYX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYX dropped -32.84% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 10-year performance, SPYX leads with 15.61% vs 9.35% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SPYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 9.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SPYX.

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.88% for SPYX.

SPYX is categorized as S&P 500, while XLU is Utilities Equities. SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPYX and 0.08% for XLU.

SPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYX and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer