PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYX vs. KRMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYX vs. KRMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than KRMA's 10.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYX has outperformed KRMA with an annualized return of 15.18%, while KRMA has yielded a comparatively lower 13.65% annualized return.


SPYX

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.49%
6M
7.84%
YTD
9.87%
1Y
21.01%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
15.18%

KRMA

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.46%
6M
8.62%
YTD
10.58%
1Y
20.02%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
13.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYX vs. KRMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
9.87%17.87%25.46%26.38%-19.59%28.06%19.87%31.62%-4.26%23.25%
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
10.58%13.98%18.12%22.08%-18.96%27.71%17.53%30.07%-3.89%22.92%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYX and KRMA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2016

0.90

The correlation between SPYX and KRMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYX vs. KRMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYX
KRMA

Technology

39.7%
41.0%

Financial Services

11.4%
12.5%

Communication Services

10.9%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
9.4%

Industrials

7.9%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
3.6%

Utilities

2.2%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.0%

Energy

1.1%
2.4%

Technology

SPYX
39.7%
KRMA
41.0%

Financial Services

SPYX
11.4%
KRMA
12.5%

Communication Services

SPYX
10.9%
KRMA
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYX
10.1%
KRMA
11.1%

Healthcare

SPYX
8.5%
KRMA
9.4%

Industrials

SPYX
7.9%
KRMA
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

SPYX
4.6%
KRMA
3.6%

Utilities

SPYX
2.2%
KRMA
1.0%

Real Estate

SPYX
1.9%
KRMA
2.0%

Basic Materials

SPYX
1.7%
KRMA
2.0%

Energy

SPYX
1.1%
KRMA
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYX vs. KRMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYX
SPYX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

KRMA
KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYX vs. KRMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYXKRMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.33

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.38

8.58

+0.80

SPYX vs. KRMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the KRMA Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYX and KRMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYX vs. KRMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, smaller than the maximum KRMA drawdown of -36.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and KRMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYXKRMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.84%

-36.16%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-8.62%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.74%

-19.41%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-26.12%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.84%

-36.16%

+3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-2.11%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-4.90%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.34%

-0.10%

Volatility

SPYX vs. KRMA - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) at 3.27%. This indicates that SPYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYXKRMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

3.27%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

10.01%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

12.72%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

17.24%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.00%

18.47%

-0.47%

SPYX vs. KRMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KRMA's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYX vs. KRMA - Dividend Comparison

SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than KRMA's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
2.38%2.59%0.91%1.16%0.86%1.07%0.96%1.52%1.82%1.21%0.96%0.00%
SPYX
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF
0.86%0.91%1.05%1.21%1.41%1.04%1.33%1.56%1.92%1.68%1.91%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SPYX and KRMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPYX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to KRMA (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYX dropped -32.84% vs KRMA's -36.16%.

On 10-year performance, SPYX leads with 15.18% vs 13.65% for KRMA. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 15.18% return vs 13.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for KRMA.

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.86% for SPYX.

SPYX is categorized as S&P 500, while KRMA is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPYX and 0.43% for KRMA.

SPYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYX and KRMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer