SPYX vs. KRMA
SPYX (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) and KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while KRMA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPYX returned 13.41%/yr vs 10.89%/yr for KRMA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPYX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for KRMA.
Performance
SPYX vs. KRMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than KRMA's 11.81% return.
SPYX
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 5.02%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 27.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.41%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
KRMA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 11.81%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 27.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYX vs. KRMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 10.04% | 17.87% | 25.46% | 26.38% | -19.59% | 28.06% | 19.87% | 31.62% | -4.26% | 23.25% |
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 11.81% | 13.98% | 18.12% | 22.08% | -18.96% | 27.71% | 17.53% | 30.07% | -3.89% | 22.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYX and KRMA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2016 | 0.90 |
The correlation between SPYX and KRMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYX vs. KRMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYX
KRMA
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYX
KRMA
Financial Services
SPYX
KRMA
Communication Services
SPYX
KRMA
Consumer Cyclical
SPYX
KRMA
Healthcare
SPYX
KRMA
Industrials
SPYX
KRMA
Consumer Defensive
SPYX
KRMA
Utilities
SPYX
KRMA
Real Estate
SPYX
KRMA
Basic Materials
SPYX
KRMA
Energy
SPYX
KRMA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYX vs. KRMA — Risk / Return Rank
SPYX
KRMA
SPYX vs. KRMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPYX | KRMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.40 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 3.25 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.68 | 13.76 | -1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPYX | KRMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.28 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.64 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.75 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SPYX vs. KRMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, smaller than the maximum KRMA drawdown of -36.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and KRMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYX | KRMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.84% | -36.16% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -8.62% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.74% | -19.41% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | -26.12% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -1.02% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -4.92% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 2.03% | +0.11% |
Volatility
SPYX vs. KRMA - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) have volatilities of 3.00% and 3.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYX | KRMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 3.12% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 9.34% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.12% | 12.32% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 17.19% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 18.51% | -0.50% |
SPYX vs. KRMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KRMA's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYX vs. KRMA - Dividend Comparison
SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than KRMA's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF | 2.32% | 2.59% | 0.91% | 1.16% | 0.86% | 1.07% | 0.96% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 1.21% | 0.96% | 0.00% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 0.84% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SPYX and KRMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
KRMA has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to SPYX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYX dropped -32.84% vs KRMA's -36.16%.
On 5-year performance, SPYX leads with 13.41% vs 10.89% for KRMA. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPYX has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 13.41% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for KRMA.
KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.84% for SPYX.
SPYX is categorized as S&P 500, while KRMA is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPYX and 0.43% for KRMA.
KRMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYX and KRMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer