SPYX vs. CHGX
SPYX (State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF) and CHGX (Stance Sustainable Beta ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPYX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while CHGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SPYX returned 12.38%/yr vs 9.09%/yr for CHGX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SPYX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for CHGX.
Performance
SPYX vs. CHGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPYX achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly lower than CHGX's 19.57% return.
SPYX
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- YTD
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 20.93%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 12.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.58%
CHGX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 16.02%
- YTD
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $397.74K | $582.66K | $623.16K | |
| $4.48M | $4.14M | $6.01M |
SPYX vs. CHGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 9.59% | 17.87% | 25.46% | 26.38% | -19.59% | 28.06% | 19.87% | 31.62% | -4.26% | 5.68% |
CHGX Stance Sustainable Beta ETF | 19.57% | 12.13% | 15.16% | 23.65% | -21.77% | 22.72% | 24.10% | 33.07% | -5.79% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPYX and CHGX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SPYX and CHGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPYX vs. CHGX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPYX
CHGX
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
SPYX
CHGX
Financial Services
SPYX
CHGX
Communication Services
SPYX
CHGX
Consumer Cyclical
SPYX
CHGX
Healthcare
SPYX
CHGX
Industrials
SPYX
CHGX
Consumer Defensive
SPYX
CHGX
Utilities
SPYX
CHGX
Real Estate
SPYX
CHGX
Basic Materials
SPYX
CHGX
Energy
SPYX
CHGX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPYX vs. CHGX — Risk / Return Rank
SPYX
CHGX
SPYX vs. CHGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Stance Sustainable Beta ETF (CHGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPYX | CHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 2.97 | -1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.39 | 10.60 | -2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPYX vs. CHGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPYX drawdown since its inception was -32.84%, smaller than the maximum CHGX drawdown of -35.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYX and CHGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPYX | CHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.84% | -35.49% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.84% | -8.50% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.74% | -18.09% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.14% | -30.26% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -3.00% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -6.36% | +1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 2.38% | -0.10% |
Volatility
SPYX vs. CHGX - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF (SPYX) and Stance Sustainable Beta ETF (CHGX) have volatilities of 3.52% and 3.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPYX | CHGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 3.43% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 11.75% | -1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.10% | 14.75% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.16% | 17.71% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 19.30% | -1.29% |
SPYX vs. CHGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPYX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CHGX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPYX vs. CHGX - Dividend Comparison
SPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than CHGX's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGX Stance Sustainable Beta ETF | 0.56% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.94% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYX State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | 0.86% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 1.41% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.56% | 1.92% | 1.68% | 1.91% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPYX and CHGX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to CHGX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYX dropped -32.84% vs CHGX's -35.49%.
On 5-year performance, SPYX leads with 12.38% vs 9.09% for CHGX. On fees, SPYX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYX has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for CHGX.
SPYX has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.56% for CHGX.
SPYX is categorized as S&P 500, while CHGX is Large Cap Growth Equities. SPYX tracks S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free Index, while CHGX tracks Change Finance Diversified Impact U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Stance. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SPYX and 0.49% for CHGX.
CHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPYX and CHGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer