SPYT vs. XYLD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

SPYT (Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. SPYT is actively managed, while XYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, SPYT returned 19.79% vs 19.53% for XYLD. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SPYT charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.

Performance

SPYT vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYT achieves a 10.78% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 8.63% return.

SPYT

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 1.74%
• 6M: 8.87%
• YTD: 10.78%
• 1Y: 19.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.38%

XYLD

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 2.36%
• 6M: 6.99%
• YTD: 8.63%
• 1Y: 19.53%
• 3Y*: 12.12%
• 5Y*: 7.92%
• 10Y*: 8.27%
• ALL TIME*: 8.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SPYT Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF	$1.79M	$1.76M	$2.31M
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	$33.43M	$34.54M	$32.48M

SPYT vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SPYT Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF	10.78%	12.41%	13.30%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	8.63%	8.02%	15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYT and XYLD is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.84

The correlation between SPYT and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYT vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SPYT	XYLD
Technology	38.5%	38.5%
Financial Services	11.6%	11.6%
Communication Services	9.9%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	9.5%
Healthcare	8.9%	8.9%
Industrials	8.4%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	4.5%
Energy	3.0%	3.0%
Utilities	2.2%	2.2%
Real Estate	1.8%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

SPYT vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SPYT

SPYT Risk / Return Rank: 74
SPYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
SPYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
SPYT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SPYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SPYT Martin Ratio Rank: 79

XYLD

XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 94
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 96
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SPYT vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SPYT	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.77	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	3.95	-1.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.63	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	3.71	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.61	19.28	-8.67

SPYT vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYT and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SPYT vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYT drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYT and XYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	SPYT	XYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.25%	-33.46%	+15.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	-5.29%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.97%	-3.68%	+1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	1.02%	+0.85%

Volatility

SPYT vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.97%. This indicates that SPYT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SPYT	XYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	1.97%	+1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.48%	5.99%	+3.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.74%	7.10%	+4.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.74%	11.27%	+3.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.74%	14.16%	+0.58%

SPYT vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYT has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

SPYT vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

SPYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.92%, more than XYLD's 10.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPYT Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF	20.92%	21.40%	17.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	10.47%	10.51%	11.54%	10.51%	13.43%	9.07%	7.93%	5.76%	7.12%	5.18%	3.23%	4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SPYT and XYLD in my portfolio?

SPYT and XYLD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SPYT or XYLD?

SPYT has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to XYLD (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYT dropped -18.25% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

Which ETF is better, SPYT or XYLD?

On 1-year performance, SPYT leads with 19.79% vs 19.53% for XYLD. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SPYT or XYLD?

Over the 1-year period, SPYT has performed better with a 19.79% return vs 19.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SPYT or XYLD?

XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SPYT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SPYT or XYLD?

SPYT has the higher dividend yield at 20.92%, compared with 10.47% for XYLD.

What is the main difference between SPYT and XYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SPYT and 0.60% for XYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.