PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYT vs. QQQH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYT vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYT achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly higher than QQQH's 5.59% return.


SPYT

1D
-1.32%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
7.21%
6M
6.55%
1Y
19.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQH

1D
-1.95%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
5.59%
6M
4.45%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYT vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
7.21%12.41%13.30%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
5.59%14.17%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYT and QQQH is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024

0.85

The correlation between SPYT and QQQH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SPYT vs. QQQH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPYT
QQQH

Technology

38.4%
58.0%

Financial Services

11.0%
0.2%

Communication Services

10.8%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
11.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
3.7%

Industrials

7.9%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
6.5%

Energy

3.2%
0.5%

Utilities

2.1%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.1%

Technology

SPYT
38.4%
QQQH
58.0%

Financial Services

SPYT
11.0%
QQQH
0.2%

Communication Services

SPYT
10.8%
QQQH
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SPYT
10.0%
QQQH
11.5%

Healthcare

SPYT
8.4%
QQQH
3.7%

Industrials

SPYT
7.9%
QQQH
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SPYT
4.6%
QQQH
6.5%

Energy

SPYT
3.2%
QQQH
0.5%

Utilities

SPYT
2.1%
QQQH
1.2%

Real Estate

SPYT
1.8%
QQQH
0.1%

Basic Materials

SPYT
1.7%
QQQH
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYT vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYT
SPYT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SPYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYT Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYT vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYTQQQHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.37

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.95

9.89

+1.05

SPYT vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the QQQH Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYT and QQQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYT vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYT drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum QQQH drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYT and QQQH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYTQQQHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-31.24%

+12.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

-6.96%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

-2.17%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.00%

-8.22%

+6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.66%

+0.14%

Volatility

SPYT vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF (SPYT) is 4.54%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that SPYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYTQQQHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

5.21%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

8.58%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.51%

10.75%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

13.35%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

13.46%

+1.44%

SPYT vs. QQQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYT has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQH's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYT vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

SPYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.21%, more than QQQH's 8.93% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
8.93%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%
SPYT
Defiance S&P 500 Income Target ETF
21.21%21.40%17.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYT and QQQH have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQH has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to SPYT (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYT dropped -18.25% vs QQQH's -31.24%.

On 1-year performance, SPYT leads with 19.62% vs 16.40% for QQQH. On fees, QQQH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, SPYT has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYT has performed better with a 19.62% return vs 16.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SPYT.

SPYT has the higher dividend yield at 21.21%, compared with 8.93% for QQQH.

SPYT is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQH is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for SPYT and 0.68% for QQQH.

SPYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYT and QQQH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer